ReviewBulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine2022
[SARS-CoV-2 variants in relation to screening and vaccines].
Review in Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As of today, September 2021, it is very difficult to predict how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will develop in France and around the world. The objective of this review is to analyze recent studies concerning SARS-CoV-2, especially those looking for its origin, particularly in viruses from various bat populations. The ability of variants to escape vaccine responses is a real concern, as these variants show increased pathogenicity. Screening of infected subjects and large-scale sequencing are essential tools to be strengthened, for monitoring the risk of emergence of possible new variants and for the development of the second generation vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.