Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34931013›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Smartphone-based digital phenotyping for dry eye toward P4 medicine: a crowdsourced cross-sectional study.

Takenori Inomata, Masahiro Nakamura, Jaemyoung Sung, Akie Midorikawa-Inomata, Masao Iwagami, Kenta Fujio, Yasutsugu Akasaki, Yuichi Okumura, Keiichi Fujimoto, Atsuko Eguchi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Takenori InomataJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan. tinoma@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-1055
Masahiro NakamuraJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Digital Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4363-069X
Jaemyoung SungJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Akie Midorikawa-InomataJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Hospital Administration, Tokyo, Japan.
Masao IwagamiDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kenta FujioJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasutsugu AkasakiJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi OkumuraJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi FujimotoJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuko EguchiJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Hospital Administration, Tokyo, Japan.
Maria MiuraJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken NaginoJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Hospital Administration, Tokyo, Japan.
Hurramhon ShokirovaJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun ZhuJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Mizu KuwaharaJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunihiko HirosawaJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.
Reza DanaMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Akira MurakamiJuntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-2514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidimensional integrative data analysis of digital phenotyping is crucial for elucidating the pathologies of multifactorial and heterogeneous diseases, such as the dry eye (DE). This crowdsourced cross-sectional study explored a novel smartphone-based digital phenotyping strategy to stratify and visualize the heterogenous DE symptoms into distinct subgroups. Multidimensional integrative data were collected from 3,593 participants between November 2016 and September 2019. Dimension reduction via Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection stratified the collected data into seven clusters of symptomatic DE. Symptom profiles and risk factors in each cluster were identified by hierarchical heatmaps and multivariate logistic regressions. Stratified DE subgroups were visualized by chord diagrams, co-occurrence networks, and Circos plot analyses to improve interpretability. Maximum blink interval was reduced in clusters 1, 2, and 5 compared to non-symptomatic DE. Clusters 1 and 5 had severe DE symptoms. A data-driven multidimensional analysis with digital phenotyping may establish predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory medicine.

Identifiers

PMID34931013
PMCPMC8688467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.