ArticleScientific reports2021
A stroke detection and discrimination framework using broadband microwave scattering on stochastic models with deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beat Pilot Tone (BPT): Simultaneous MRI and RF motion sensing at arbitrary frequencies.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- An experimental system for detection and localization of hemorrhage using ultra-wideband microwaves with deep learning.Communications engineering · 2024Article
- Pre-Hospital Stroke Care beyond the MSU.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Clinical electromagnetic brain scanner.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Crescent Antennas as Sensors: Case of Sensing Brain Pathology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Electromagnetic tomographic cerebral angiography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diagnosis of a brain stroke using wideband microwave scattering.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Automatic identification of early ischemic lesions on non-contrast CT with deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke poses an immense public health burden and remains among the primary causes of death and disability worldwide. Emergent therapy is often precluded by late or indeterminate times of onset before initial clinical presentation. Rapid, mobile, safe and low-cost stroke detection technology remains a deeply unmet clinical need. Past studies have explored the use of microwave and other small form-factor strategies for rapid stroke detection; however, widespread clinical adoption remains unrealized. Here, we investigated the use of microwave scattering perturbations from ultra wide-band antenna arrays to learn dielectric signatures of disease. Two deep neural networks (DNNs) were used for: (1) stroke detection ("classification network"), and (2) characterization of the hemorrhage location and size ("discrimination network"). Dielectric signatures were learned on a simulated cohort of 666 hemorrhagic stroke and control subjects using 2D stochastic head models. The classification network yielded a stratified K-fold stroke detection accuracy > 94% with an AUC of 0.996, while the discrimination network resulted in a mean squared error of < 0.004 cm and < 0.02 cm, for the stroke localization and size estimation, respectively. We report a novel approach to intelligent diagnostics using microwave wide-band scattering information thus circumventing conventional image-formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.