Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930792›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2022

Changing the medication documentation process for discharge: impact on clinical routine and documentation quality-a process analysis.

Benedict Morath, Anette Lampert, Franziska Elisabeth Glaß, Michael Metzner, Discharge Study Team, Walter Emil Haefeli, Hanna M Seidling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benedict MorathDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Anette LampertDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Franziska Elisabeth GlaßDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Michael MetznerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Discharge Study TeamHeidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Walter Emil HaefeliDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Hanna M SeidlingDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Hanna.seidling@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn 2017, an in-house best-practice process for medication documentation was developed and implemented to meet the new German legal requirements concerning the management of patient discharge from the hospital. Because this law regulates the common steps of good discharge practices (eg, specification of discharge mediation documentation), we used its implementation to assess the impact of such a measure on the quality of medication documentation and related workflows in clinical routine.

methodsBy observing workflows and interviewing the affected employees, we analysed the medication workflow processes from admission to discharge of seven representative departments of a large university hospital before and early after implementation of a newly defined best-practice process. To investigate the implementation impact, following measures were determined overall and for five key process steps: quality of medication documentation as measured by predefined criteria, the adherence to the best-practice process (range 0%-100%), workload and potential shifts in responsibilities.

resultsAlready early after implementation, all departments met the legal requirements and the quality of the medication documentation increased from low to high quality in most departments. Mean adherence to the best-practice process was 77% (range 60%-100%) with strictest adherence of 100% in one department. Thereby, the number of process steps and hence, likely also the workload increased in all departments. New tasks were mainly performed by physicians and in one department by pharmacists.

conclusionsThe new lawful best-practice process led to a higher quality in medication documentation at the cost of a higher workload for physicians, potentially limiting time for other care tasks. Therefore, it could be important to define areas of the medication documentation process in which physicians could be supported by other professions or new tools facilitating accurate medication documentation as the basis of continuity of care.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePhysiciansDocumentationHumansPharmacistsWorkflowdischarge managementelectronic prescribingimplementation researchmedication documentationprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34930792
PMCPMC8717803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.