Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930583›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2022

Going the (social) distance: Comparing the effectiveness of online versus in-person Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization procedural training.

Jessica M Gonzalez-Vargas, Haroula M Tzamaras, Jason Martinez, Dailen C Brown, Jason Z Moore, David C Han, Elizabeth Sinz, Philip Ng, Michael X Yang, Scarlett R Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PROGRESSIVE MEDICAL SIMULATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE INTEGRATION OF PROGRESSIVE AND PERSONALIZED LEARNING IN CENTRAL LINE SIMULATORS.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2023
    Article
  6. Preparing for the lasting effects of COVID-19 on medical training: The design and pilot study of a low-fidelity virtual reality prototype for Central Venous Catheterization training.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessica M Gonzalez-VargasDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Haroula M TzamarasDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Jason MartinezDepartment of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Dailen C BrownDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Jason Z MooreDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
David C HanDepartment of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA; Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Elizabeth SinzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Philip NgDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Michael X YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Scarlett R MillerDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA; School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. Electronic address: scarlettmiller@psu.edu.

Funding

Dynamic Haptic Robotic Training for Central Venous Catheter InsertionR01HL127316 · NHLBI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI Scarlett Miller, Jason Zachary Moore · 2015 to 2026
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study compares surgical residents' knowledge acquisition of ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization (US-IJCVC) between in-person and online procedural training cohorts before receiving independent in-person Dynamic Haptic Robotic Simulation training.

methodsThree surgical residency procedural training cohorts, two in-person (N = 26) and one online (N = 14), were compared based on their performance on a 24-item US-IJCVC evaluation checklist completed by an expert physician completed after training. Pre- and post-training US-IJCVC knowledge was also compared for the online cohort.

resultsNo significant change in the pass rates on the US-IJCVC checklist was found between in-person and online cohorts (p = 0.208). There were differences in the Economy of Time and Motion between in-person and online cohorts (p < 0.005). The online cohort had significant increases in US-IJCVC knowledge pre-to post-training (p < 0.008).

conclusionOnline training with independent simulation practice was as effective as in-person training for US-IJCVC.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousInternship and ResidencySimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansCentral venous catheterizationComputer-based learningMedical simulationResidency bootcampSimulation-based learning

Identifiers

PMID34930583
PMCPMC9170828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.