Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930525›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Mimicry can drive convergence in structural and light transmission features of transparent wings in Lepidoptera.

Charline Sophie Pinna, Maëlle Vilbert, Stephan Borensztajn, Willy Daney de Marcillac, Florence Piron-Prunier, Aaron Pomerantz, Nipam H Patel, Serge Berthier, Christine Andraud, Doris Gomez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi-scale dissection of wing transparency in the clearwing butterflyJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Charline Sophie PinnaInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), CNRS, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-0893
Maëlle VilbertCentre de Recherche sur la Conservation (CRC), CNRS, MNHN, Ministère de la Culture, Paris, France.
Stephan BorensztajnInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP), Université de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France.
Willy Daney de MarcillacInstitut des NanoSciences de Paris (INSP), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Paris, France.
Florence Piron-PrunierInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), CNRS, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-5123
Aaron PomerantzMarine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6412-9001
Nipam H PatelMarine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-654X
Serge BerthierInstitut des NanoSciences de Paris (INSP), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9255-059X
Christine AndraudCentre de Recherche sur la Conservation (CRC), CNRS, MNHN, Ministère de la Culture, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3112-9363
Doris Gomez *Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), CNRS, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-3426
Marianne Elias *Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), CNRS, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1250-2353
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMarine Biological Laboratory · USMinistère de la Culture · DZ

Funding

Role of Mitochondrial CYP2E1 in Chemical Exposure-Driven NeurodegenerationF32ES027306 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARTMAN, JESSICA HELENE · 2016 to 2018
$171k
NIEHS NIH HHS 27306C2005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Müllerian mimicry is a positive interspecific interaction, whereby co-occurring defended prey species share a common aposematic signal. In Lepidoptera, aposematic species typically harbour conspicuous opaque wing colour patterns with convergent optical properties among co-mimetic species. Surprisingly, some aposematic mimetic species have partially transparent wings, raising the questions of whether optical properties of transparent patches are also convergent, and of how transparency is achieved. Here, we conducted a comparative study of wing optics, micro and nanostructures in neotropical mimetic clearwing Lepidoptera, using spectrophotometry and microscopy imaging. We show that transparency, as perceived by predators, is convergent among co-mimics in some mimicry rings. Underlying micro- and nanostructures are also sometimes convergent despite a large structural diversity. We reveal that while transparency is primarily produced by microstructure modifications, nanostructures largely influence light transmission, potentially enabling additional fine-tuning in transmission properties. This study shows that transparency might not only enable camouflage but can also be part of aposematic signals.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBiological MimicryAnimalsButterfliesColorEcuadorFemaleMalePeruWings, Animalaposematismecologyevolutionary biologyinsectsLepidopteramimicrynanostructuresopticstransparency

Identifiers

PMID34930525
PMCPMC8691843
OpenAlexW4200068203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.