Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930504›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2021

Early life skin microbial trajectory as a function of vertical and environmental transmission in Bornean foam-nesting frogs.

Sarah McGrath-Blaser, Morgan Steffen, T Ulmar Grafe, María Torres-Sánchez, David S McLeod, Carly R Muletz-Wolz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The fungal pathogenISME communications · 2026
    Article
  3. Advancing the study of microbial symbionts of amphibians and reptiles.Frontiers in amphibian and reptile science · 2026
    Article
  4. Bioaccumulation, Ecotoxicity, and Microbial Responses inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah McGrath-BlaserDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, 421 Carr Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. sarah.mcgrath@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-4327
Morgan SteffenDepartment of Biology, James Madison University, 951 Carrier Dr, Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9755-9879
T Ulmar GrafeUniversiti Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link, Gadong, BE 1410, Brunei.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4468-7954
María Torres-SánchezDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, 421 Carr Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8484-9279
David S McLeodDepartment of Biology, James Madison University, 951 Carrier Dr, Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3369-0661
Carly R Muletz-WolzSmithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Center for Conservation Genomics, 3001 Connecticut Ave., Washington, DC, 20008, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5047-9601

Funding

National Geographic Society WW-079ER-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe amphibian skin microbiome is an important mediator of host health and serves as a potential source of undiscovered scientifically significant compounds. However, the underlying modalities of how amphibian hosts obtain their initial skin-associated microbiome remains unclear. Here, we explore microbial transmission patterns in foam-nest breeding tree frogs from Southeast Asia (Genus: Polypedates) whose specialized breeding strategy allows for better delineation between vertically and environmentally derived microbes. To facilitate this, we analyzed samples associated with adult frog pairs taken after mating-including adults of each sex, their foam nests, environments, and tadpoles before and after environmental interaction-for the bacterial communities using DNA metabarcoding data (16S rRNA). Samples were collected from frogs in-situ in Brunei, Borneo, a previously unsampled region for amphibian-related microbial diversity.

resultsAdult frogs differed in skin bacterial communities among species, but tadpoles did not differ among species. Foam nests had varying bacterial community composition, most notably in the nests' moist interior. Nest interior bacterial communities were discrete for each nest and overall displayed a narrower diversity compared to the nest exteriors. Tadpoles sampled directly from the foam nest displayed a bacterial composition less like the nest interior and more similar to that of the adults and nest exterior. After one week of pond water interaction the tadpole skin microbiome shifted towards the tadpole skin and pond water microbial communities being more tightly coupled than between tadpoles and the internal nest environment, but not to the extent that the skin microbiome mirrored the pond bacterial community.

conclusionsBoth vertical influence and environmental interaction play a role in shaping the tadpole cutaneous microbiome. Interestingly, the interior of the foam nest had a distinct bacterial community from the tadpoles suggesting a limited environmental effect on tadpole cutaneous bacterial selection at initial stages of life. The shift in the tadpole microbiome after environmental interaction indicates an interplay between underlying host and ecological mechanisms that drive community formation. This survey serves as a baseline for further research into the ecology of microbial transmission in aquatic animals.

Indexed as

AmphibianAmplicon sequencingBacteriaBruneiEnvironmental transmissionMetabarcodingMicrobiomePolypedatesVertical transmission

Identifiers

PMID34930504
PMCPMC8686334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.