Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930484›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of medical research2021

Observational case series: six neurosurgical patients with septic shock demonstrating clinical improvement after a combination of standard care and blood purification.

A I Burov, T A Abramov, N S Kostritca, D S Korotkov, G V Danilov, Y V Strunina, I A Savin

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A I BurovFederal State Autonomous Institution N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation. aleksander.bour@mail.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7909-2993
T A AbramovFederal State Autonomous Institution N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9542-3801
N S KostritcaFederal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-8727
D S KorotkovFederal State Autonomous Institution N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2204-4480
G V DanilovFederal State Autonomous Institution N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1442-5993
Y V StruninaFederal State Autonomous Institution N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5010-6661
I A SavinFederal State Autonomous Institution N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-5441
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUMinistry of Health · TO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with primary brain injury, septic shock is especially dangerous due to the possibility of secondary cerebral damage. The key factor of sepsis-associated brain injury is inflammatory mediators, pathogen and damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs, DAMPs) release. Theoretically, blood purification may be beneficial for patients with primary brain injury due to its possibility for fast removal of inflammatory mediators. CASE PRESENTATION: We report on six post-neurosurgery septic shock patients treated with combined blood purification (CBP), which included CRRT with high adsorption capacity membrane in combination with CytoSorb adsorber. Clinical improvement in the course of CBP was registered in all patients. Three patients had a stable clinical improvement; the other three patients had only a transient improvement due to underlying neurological and cardiac deficits aggravation. We observed septic shock reversal in four patients. The key observations of the case series are a significant decrease in MOF severity (measured by SOFA score) and in catecholamine need (not statistically significant). By the end of CBP we observed a significant decrease in blood lactate, PCT and IL-6 levels. Two patients demonstrated level of consciousness increase in the setting of CBP therapy measured by GCS and FOUR score.

conclusionThis case series demonstrates that CBP therapy may have a role for septic shock patients with primary brain injury.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHemoperfusionHumansInflammation MediatorsMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresShock, SepticSurgical Wound InfectionInflammation MediatorsBlood purificationContinuous renal replacement therapyHemoadsorptionHigh adsorption capacity membraneInflammatory mediators adsorberSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID34930484
PMCPMC8691076
OpenAlexW4200345933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.