Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930436›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2021

Would you like to be contacted about future research?

Lisa Newington, Caroline M Alexander, Mary Wells

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa NewingtonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. l.newington@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6954-2981
Caroline M AlexanderImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1816-8939
Mary WellsImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-2773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many research participants are willing to be contacted about future research opportunities, however this question is not always asked. Furthermore, if participants do consent for contact about future research, this information is not always accessible to other research teams. We discuss our experience of recruiting individuals who have previously taken part in healthcare research and suggest potential strategies to support this process and enable greater research participation.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchHumansResearch consentResearch gatekeepersResearch managementResearch participationResearch recruitment

Identifiers

PMID34930436
PMCPMC8691048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.