Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930404›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Promoting physical activity and health in Hong Kong primary school children through a blended physical literacy intervention: protocol and baseline characteristics of the "Stand+Move" randomized controlled trial.

Ming Hui Li, Cindy Hui Ping Sit, Stephen Heung Sang Wong, Yun Kwok Wing, Ching Kong Ng, Raymond Kim Wai Sum

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physical Activity Levels and Sleep in Schoolchildren (6-17) with and without School Sport.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Research on the Relationship between Physical Literacy, Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ming Hui LiDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Cindy Hui Ping SitDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Stephen Heung Sang WongDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yun Kwok WingDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ching Kong NgStewards Pooi Kei Primary School, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Raymond Kim Wai SumDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. kwsum@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

Direct Grant 2019-052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren predominantly remain sedentary in a traditional classroom. This study aimed to demonstrate the design and baseline characteristics of a three-armed intervention program that targeted enhancements in children's physical literacy (PL), physical activity (PA), sleep, and executive functions by constructing an active classroom environment in primary schools. The blended approach involved organized PA participation during recess combined with changes to the classroom environment in response to the emphasis on nurturing children's PL in Hong Kong.

methodsThis blended "Stand + Move" intervention adopted a randomized controlled trial design to investigate its effectiveness in improving health-related aspects. Three groups were compared: (1) PA recess intervention, (2) blended (sit-stand desks and PA recess) experimental, and (3) control groups. In this 13-week intervention (from March to September 2019), 76 students (59.2% girls) were recruited and randomly assigned to the three groups. The primary outcomes were children's PL and PA. The secondary outcomes were children's sleep and executive functions.

resultsBaseline data were evaluated. The mean age was 9.6 years [standard deviation = 0.61, range 9.0-12.0]. There were no significant differences between trial arms at baseline concerning any of the outcomes (all P = 0.06-0.89). Overall, 22.4% met the recommended PA guidelines, 36.8% met the sleep guidelines, and 10.5% met both guidelines. Three aspects of executive functions were evaluated: inhibition, executive control, and planning. Over half of the participants reported satisfaction with their perceived sleep quality.

conclusionsThe designed intervention is regarded as an innovative strategy that incorporates sit-stand desks and PA breaks to reconstruct children's traditional classroom environment. The baseline results suggest that intervention was satisfactory in reducing students' sitting time and increasing their PA engagement. We demonstrated the benefits of this intervention on children's PL, various sleep patterns, and executive functions. As expected, the designed intervention changes made to the classroom improved children's health behaviors, as well as the support from stakeholders at schools and the children's families. Our results also provided the desired evidence for policy reforms in teaching and learning strategies.

trial registrationChiCTR ChiCTR2000035038 . Registered on July 29, 2020-retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

LiteracySleep QualityChildExerciseFemaleHong KongHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchoolsChildrenExecutive functionsPhysical activityPhysical literacyPrimary schoolSit-stand deskSleep

Identifiers

PMID34930404
PMCPMC8691020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.