Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930380›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study.

Ga-Young Choi, Chang-Hee Han, Hyung-Tak Lee, Nam-Jong Paik, Won-Seok Kim, Han-Jeong Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ga-Young ChoiDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, 30019, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Hee HanDepartment of Software, College of Software Convergence, Dongseo University, Busan, 47011, South Korea.
Hyung-Tak LeeDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, 30019, Republic of Korea.
Nam-Jong PaikDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Won-Seok KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, 13620, Republic of Korea. wondol77@gmail.com.
Han-Jeong HwangDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, 30019, Republic of Korea. hwanghj@korea.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-1183-1219
Korea University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRDongseo University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo apply transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) to the motor cortex, motor hotspots are generally identified using motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The objective of this study is to validate the feasibility of a novel electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor-hotspot-identification approach using a machine learning technique as a potential alternative to TMS.

methodsEEG data were measured using 63 channels from thirty subjects as they performed a simple finger tapping task. Power spectral densities of the EEG data were extracted from six frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma, and full) and were independently used to train and test an artificial neural network for motor hotspot identification. The 3D coordinate information of individual motor hotspots identified by TMS were quantitatively compared with those estimated by our EEG-based motor-hotspot-identification approach to assess its feasibility.

resultsThe minimum mean error distance between the motor hotspot locations identified by TMS and our proposed motor-hotspot-identification approach was 0.22 ± 0.03 cm, demonstrating the proof-of-concept of our proposed EEG-based approach. A mean error distance of 1.32 ± 0.15 cm was measured when using only nine channels attached to the middle of the motor cortex, showing the possibility of practically using the proposed motor-hotspot-identification approach based on a relatively small number of EEG channels.

conclusionWe demonstrated the feasibility of our novel EEG-based motor-hotspot-identification method. It is expected that our approach can be used as an alternative to TMS for motor hotspot identification. In particular, its usability would significantly increase when using a recently developed portable tES device integrated with an EEG device.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansNeural Networks, ComputerUpper ExtremityArtificial neural-networkElectroencephalographyMachine learningMotor hotspotTranscranial electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34930380
PMCPMC8686235
OpenAlexW4200491731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.