Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930374›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

A new approach to identifying patients with elevated risk for Fabry disease using a machine learning algorithm.

John L Jefferies, Alison K Spencer, Heather A Lau, Matthew W Nelson, Joseph D Giuliano, Joseph W Zabinski, Costas Boussios, Gary Curhan, Richard E Gliklich, David G Warnock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cardiac manifestations of Fabry disease.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

John L JefferiesDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Alison K SpencerOM1, Boston, MA, USA.
Heather A LauDivision of Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Matthew W NelsonAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Cranbury, NJ, USA.
Joseph D GiulianoAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Cranbury, NJ, USA.
Joseph W ZabinskiOM1, Boston, MA, USA. jzabinski@om1.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3182-6983
Costas BoussiosOM1, Boston, MA, USA.
Gary CurhanOM1, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard E GliklichOM1, Boston, MA, USA.
David G WarnockDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Office of Multidisciplinary Activities · USAmicus Therapeutics (United States) · USNew York University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFabry disease (FD) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by glycosphingolipid accumulation and progressive damage across multiple organ systems. Due to its heterogeneous presentation, the condition is likely significantly underdiagnosed. Several approaches, including provider education efforts and newborn screening, have attempted to address underdiagnosis of FD across the age spectrum, with limited success. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods present another option for improving diagnosis. These methods isolate common health history patterns among patients using longitudinal real-world data, and can be particularly useful when patients experience nonspecific, heterogeneous symptoms over time. In this study, the performance of an AI tool in identifying patients with FD was analyzed. The tool was calibrated using de-identified health record data from a large cohort of nearly 5000 FD patients, and extracted phenotypic patterns from these records. The tool then used this FD pattern information to make individual-level estimates of FD in a testing dataset. Patterns were reviewed and confirmed with medical experts.

resultsThe AI tool demonstrated strong analytic performance in identifying FD patients. In out-of-sample testing, it achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.82. Strong performance was maintained when testing on male-only and female-only cohorts, with AUROCs of 0.83 and 0.82 respectively. The tool identified small segments of the population with greatly increased prevalence of FD: in the 1% of the population identified by the tool as at highest risk, FD was 23.9 times more prevalent than in the population overall. The AI algorithm used hundreds of phenotypic signals to make predictions and included both familiar symptoms associated with FD (e.g. renal manifestations) as well as less well-studied characteristics.

conclusionsThe AI tool analyzed in this study performed very well in identifying Fabry disease patients using structured medical history data. Performance was maintained in all-male and all-female cohorts, and the phenotypic manifestations of FD highlighted by the tool were reviewed and confirmed by clinical experts in the condition. The platform's analytic performance, transparency, and ability to generate predictions based on existing real-world health data may allow it to contribute to reducing persistent underdiagnosis of Fabry disease.

Indexed as

Fabry DiseaseAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornKidneyMachine LearningMaleAIFabry diseasePatient identificationPhenotypic biomarker

Identifiers

PMID34930374
PMCPMC8686369
OpenAlexW4200595382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.