Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930203›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Implementing individual placement and support (IPS): the experiences of employment specialists in the early implementation phase of IPS in Northern Norway. The IPSNOR study.

Cathrine Moe, Beate Brinchmann, Line Rasmussen, Oda Lekve Brandseth, David McDaid, Eóin Killackey, Miles Rinaldi, Marit Borg, Arnstein Mykletun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cathrine MoeNordland Hospital Trust, Centre for Work and Mental Health, Bodø, Norway. cathrine.f.moe@nord.no.
Beate BrinchmannNordland Hospital Trust, Centre for Work and Mental Health, Bodø, Norway.
Line RasmussenNordland Hospital Trust, Centre for Work and Mental Health, Bodø, Norway.
Oda Lekve BrandsethNordland Hospital Trust, Centre for Work and Mental Health, Bodø, Norway.
David McDaidCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Eóin KillackeyOrygen, Melbourne, Australia.
Miles RinaldiSouth West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Marit BorgNordland Hospital Trust, Centre for Work and Mental Health, Bodø, Norway.
Arnstein MykletunNordland Hospital Trust, Centre for Work and Mental Health, Bodø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor decades there has been a continuous increase in the number of people receiving welfare benefits for being outside the work force due to mental illness. There is sufficient evidence for the efficacy of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) for gaining and maintaining competitive employment. Yet, IPS is still not implemented as routine practice in public community mental health services. Knowledge about implementation challenges as experienced by the practitioners is limited. This study seeks to explore the experiences of the front-line workers, known as employment specialists, in the early implementation phase.

methodsQualitative data were collected through field notes and five focus group interviews. The study participants were 45 IPS employment specialists located at 14 different sites in Northern Norway. Transcripts and field notes were analysed by thematic analyses.

resultsWhile employment specialists are key to the implementation process, implementing IPS requires more than creating and filling the role of the employment specialist. It requires adjustments in multiple organisations. The new employment specialist then is a pioneer of service development. Some employment specialists found this a difficult challenge, and one that did not correspond to their expectations going into this role. Others appreciated the pioneering role. IPS implementation also challenged the delegation of roles and responsibilities between sectors, and related legal frameworks related to confidentiality and access. The facilitating role of human relationships emphasised the importance of social support which is an important factor in a healthy work environment. Rural areas with long distances and close- knit societies may cause challenges for implementation.

conclusionThe study provides increased understanding on what happens in the early implementation phase of IPS from the employment specialists' perspective. Results from this study can contribute to increased focus on job satisfaction, turnover and recruitment of employment specialists, factors which have previously been shown to influence the success of IPS. The greatest challenge for making "IPS efficacy in trials" become "IPS effectiveness in the real world" is implementation, and this study has highlighted some of the implementation issues.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesEmployment, SupportedMental DisordersHumansRehabilitation, VocationalSpecializationEarly phaseEmployment specialistImplementationIndividual placement and supportMental illnessRuralSupported employmentVocational rehabilitationWork

Identifiers

PMID34930203
PMCPMC8690340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.