Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34930193›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Acute respiratory infection symptoms and COVID-19 testing behaviour: results based on South Australian health surveys.

S Joshi, K D'Onise, R Nolan, S Davis, K Glass, K Lokuge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S JoshiEpidemiology Branch, Prevention and Population Health, Wellbeing SA, Government of South Australia, Level 9, The Conservatory, Rundle Mall, PO BOX 388, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. suresh.joshi@sa.gov.au.
K D'OniseEpidemiology Branch, Prevention and Population Health, Wellbeing SA, Government of South Australia, Level 9, The Conservatory, Rundle Mall, PO BOX 388, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
R NolanEpidemiology Branch, Prevention and Population Health, Wellbeing SA, Government of South Australia, Level 9, The Conservatory, Rundle Mall, PO BOX 388, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
S DavisHumanitarian Health Research Initiative, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, 62A Mills Road, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
K GlassNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, 62A Mills Road, ACT 2601, Canberra, Australia.
K LokugeHumanitarian Health Research Initiative, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, 62A Mills Road, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Australian National University · AUGovernment of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective syndromic surveillance alongside COVID-19 testing behaviours in the population including in higher risk and hard to reach subgroups is vital to detect re-emergence of COVID-19 transmission in the community. The aim of this paper was to identify the prevalence of acute respiratory infection symptoms and coronavirus testing behaviour among South Australians using data from a population based survey.

methodsWe used cross-sectional data from the 2020 state-wide population level health survey on 6857 respondents aged 18 years and above. Descriptive statistics were used to explore the risk factors and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the factors associated with the acute respiratory infection symptoms and coronavirus testing behaviour after adjusting for gender, age, household size, household income, Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander status, SEIFA, Country of birth, number of chronic diseases, wellbeing, psychological distress, and mental health.

resultsWe found that 19.3% of respondents reported having symptoms of acute respiratory infection and the most commonly reported symptoms were a runny nose (11.2%), coughing (9.9%) and sore throat (6.2%). Fever and cough were reported by 0.8% of participants. Of the symptomatic respondents, 32.6% reported seeking health advice from a nurse, doctor or healthcare provider. Around 18% (n = 130) of symptomatic respondents had sought testing and a further 4.3% (n = 31) reported they intended to get tested. The regression results suggest that older age, larger household size, a higher number of chronic disease, mental health condition, poor wellbeing, and psychological distress were associated with higher odds of ARI symptoms. Higher household income was associated with lower odds of being tested or intending to be tested for coronavirus after adjusting for other explanatory variables.

conclusionsThere were relatively high rates of self-reported acute respiratory infection during a period of very low COVID-19 prevalence and low rate of coronavirus testing among symptomatic respondents. Ongoing monitoring of testing uptake, including in higher-risk groups, and possible interventions to improve testing uptake is key to early detection of disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingAgedAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesHealth SurveysHumansSARS-CoV-2South AustraliaARICoronavirus testingCOVID-19Population surveySyndromic surveillance

Identifiers

PMID34930193
PMCPMC8685806
OpenAlexW4200304216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.