ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2021
Sex-differences in the management and clinical outcome among patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indirect Cost Analysis and Evaluation of Factors Affecting Indirect Costs in Patients Hospitalized with Acute Coronary Syndrome in Inpatient Wards of a Training and Research Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Unified Regimen for Eliminating Undiagnosed/Untreated Aortic Valve Stenosis: Algorithm Validation for Identifying Aortic Stenosis and Treatment Disparities.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- Sex differences in cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Sex differences in time to testing for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: a survival analysis.Clinical therapeutics · 2025Article
- Hypertriglyceridemia as an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in female patients with acute myocardial infarction: a comprehensive retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current study was to compare the management and clinical outcome between women and men with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
methodThis was a retrospective study. Patients with ACS presented to the emergency department were enrolled. Management and clinical outcomes (including mortality and acute decompensated heart failure [ADHF]) were compared between women and men.
resultsA total of 686 patients were included and women accounted for 38.5% (n = 264). Women were less likely to receive ticagrelor at the emergency department (18.2% vs 25.1%). Duration from arrival at the emergency department to undergo electrocardiogram was longer in women (7.5 min vs 5.3 min). The duration from symptom onset to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention was longer in women (14.4 h vs 7.2 h). After adjusting for covariates, odds ratio (OR) for cardiovascular mortality was 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-1.02) and ADHF was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55-1.01) for women vs men. Socioeconomic status, duration from symptom onset to arrive at the emergency department, and management at the emergency department were the important factors contributing to the sex-differences in clinical outcome.
conclusionAmong ACS patients undergoing PCI, there was no sex-difference in in-hospital clinical outcome after adjusting for covariates. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether improving management at the emergency department can improve clinical outcomes in women and men with ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.