Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34929092›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychology2021

Longitudinal changes in young children's strategy use for emotion regulation.

K Ashana Ratcliff, Lauren C Vazquez, Erika S Lunkenheimer, Pamela M Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Developmental stability and change in emotion regulation strategies and strategy repertoires across adolescence.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Investigating the developmental timing of self-regulation in early childhood.International journal of behavioral development · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K Ashana RatcliffDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-2909
Lauren C VazquezDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0002-8183-4116
Erika S LunkenheimerDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0002-6423-256X
Pamela M ColeDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0002-0753-7009

Funding

Toward a Unifying Model of Self-Regulation and its DevelopmentR01HD076994 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI COLE, PAMELA M, RAM, NILAM · 2014 to 2019
$2.8M
FAMILY PROCESSES, RISK AND PRESCHOOL EMOTION REGULATIONR01MH061388 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI COLE, PAMELA MARIE · 2001 to 2005
$1.8M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076994NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of strategies that support autonomous self-regulation of emotion is key for early childhood emotion regulation. Children are thought to transition from predominant reliance on more automatic or interpersonal strategies to reliance on more effortful, autonomous strategies as they develop cognitive skills that can be recruited for self-regulation. However, there are few longitudinal studies documenting age-related changes in different forms and dimensions of strategies. The current study tested predicted age-related changes in strategy use in a task requiring children to wait for something they want. Specifically, we examined the longitudinal trajectories of 3 strategies commonly observed in delayed reward tasks: self-soothing, seeking attention about the demands of waiting (bids), and distracting oneself. We followed a sample of 120 children (54% male, 93.3% white, from semirural and rural economically strained households) from ages 24 months to 5 years who participated in a waiting task each year. Using growth curve modeling, we found declines in self-soothing, rises and then declines in bidding, and increases in distraction from 24 months to 5 years. Next, we investigated whether strategy use trajectories predicted adult ratings of children's emotion regulation during the task, that is, whether children appeared calm and acted appropriately while waiting. Growth in duration and dominance of distraction use predicted judgments that children were well-regulated by age 5 years, whereas growth in dominance of bidding use negatively predicted being rated as well-regulated. We discuss implications for the understanding of strategy development and future directions, including understanding strategy effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationAttentionChildChild, PreschoolEmotionsFemaleHumansJudgmentLongitudinal StudiesMale

Identifiers

PMID34929092
PMCPMC8694582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.