Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34928978›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Computed tomography radiomics for the prediction of thymic epithelial tumor histology, TNM stage and myasthenia gravis.

Christian Blüthgen, Miriam Patella, André Euler, Bettina Baessler, Katharina Martini, Jochen von Spiczak, Didier Schneiter, Isabelle Opitz, Thomas Frauenfelder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian BlüthgenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7321-5676
Miriam PatellaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7622-9472
André EulerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5019-4585
Bettina BaesslerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Katharina MartiniInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2638-6832
Jochen von SpiczakInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Didier SchneiterDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Isabelle OpitzDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5900-9040
Thomas FrauenfelderInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-6619
University Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate CT-derived radiomics for machine learning-based classification of thymic epithelial tumor (TET) stage (TNM classification), histology (WHO classification) and the presence of myasthenia gravis (MG).

methodsPatients with histologically confirmed TET in the years 2000-2018 were retrospectively included, excluding patients with incompatible imaging or other tumors. CT scans were reformatted uniformly, gray values were normalized and discretized. Tumors were segmented manually; 15 scans were re-segmented after 2 weeks by two readers. 1316 radiomic features were calculated (pyRadiomics). Features with low intra-/inter-reader agreement (ICC<0.75) were excluded. Repeated nested cross-validation was used for feature selection (Boruta algorithm), model training, and evaluation (out-of-fold predictions). Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values were calculated to assess feature importance.

results105 patients undergoing surgery for TET were identified. After applying exclusion criteria, 62 patients (28 female; mean age, 57±14 years; range, 22-82 years) with 34 low-risk TET (LRT; WHO types A/AB/B1), 28 high-risk TET (HRT; WHO B2/B3/C) in early stage (49, TNM stage I-II) or advanced stage (13, TNM III-IV) were included. 14(23%) of the patients had MG. 334(25%) features were excluded after intra-/inter-reader analysis. Discriminatory performance of the random forest classifiers was good for histology(AUC, 87.6%; 95% confidence interval, 76.3-94.3) and TNM stage(AUC, 83.8%; 95%CI, 66.9-93.4) but poor for the prediction of MG (AUC, 63.9%; 95%CI, 44.8-79.5).

conclusionsCT-derived radiomic features may be a useful imaging biomarker for TET histology and TNM stage.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHistological TechniquesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyasthenia GravisNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesThymus Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34928978
PMCPMC8687592
OpenAlexW4200243233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.