Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34928949›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Domestication reshaped the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in a maize landrace compared to its wild relative, teosinte.

Luis Fernando Samayoa, Bode A Olukolu, Chin Jian Yang, Qiuyue Chen, Markus G Stetter, Alessandra M York, Jose de Jesus Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jeffrey C Glaubitz, Peter J Bradbury, Maria Cinta Romay and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Luis Fernando SamayoaDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9651-9939
Bode A OlukoluDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4143-8909
Chin Jian YangLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Qiuyue ChenLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3304-8321
Markus G StetterInstitute for Plant Sciences and Center of Excellence on Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-0589
Alessandra M YorkLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7899-6368
Jose de Jesus Sanchez-GonzalezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan, Jalisco, México.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-3603
Jeffrey C GlaubitzInstitute of Biotechnology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Peter J BradburyUS Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3825-8480
Maria Cinta RomayInstitute of Biotechnology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9309-1586
Qi SunInstitute of Biotechnology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-2204
Jinliang YangDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0999-3518
Jeffrey Ross-IbarraDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1656-4954
Edward S BucklerUS Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-371X
John F DoebleyLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1696-7112
James B HollandDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-9675
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USCornell University · USAgricultural Research Service · USNorth Carolina State University · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversidad de Guadalajara · MXUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inbreeding depression is the reduction in fitness and vigor resulting from mating of close relatives observed in many plant and animal species. The extent to which the genetic load of mutations contributing to inbreeding depression is due to large-effect mutations versus variants with very small individual effects is unknown and may be affected by population history. We compared the effects of outcrossing and self-fertilization on 18 traits in a landrace population of maize, which underwent a population bottleneck during domestication, and a neighboring population of its wild relative teosinte. Inbreeding depression was greater in maize than teosinte for 15 of 18 traits, congruent with the greater segregating genetic load in the maize population that we predicted from sequence data. Parental breeding values were highly consistent between outcross and selfed offspring, indicating that additive effects determine most of the genetic value even in the presence of strong inbreeding depression. We developed a novel linkage scan to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) representing large-effect rare variants carried by only a single parent, which were more important in teosinte than maize. Teosinte also carried more putative juvenile-acting lethal variants identified by segregation distortion. These results suggest a mixture of mostly polygenic, small-effect partially recessive effects in linkage disequilibrium underlying inbreeding depression, with an additional contribution from rare larger-effect variants that was more important in teosinte but depleted in maize following the domestication bottleneck. Purging associated with the maize domestication bottleneck may have selected against some large effect variants, but polygenic load is harder to purge and overall segregating mutational burden increased in maize compared to teosinte.

Indexed as

DomesticationGenes, PlantGenetic VariationInbreeding DepressionPhenotypePlant BreedingPlant ProteinsQuantitative Trait LociSelection, GeneticZea maysPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34928949
PMCPMC8722731
OpenAlexW4225726137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.