Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34928519›Full record

Trial reportThe Laryngoscope2022

Pharyngo-Esophageal Modulatory Swallow Responses to Bolus Volume and Viscosity Across Time.

Joeke L Nollet, Per Cajander, Lara F Ferris, Jordache Ramjith, Taher I Omari, Johanna Savilampi

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Laryngoscope, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pharyngeal adaptation to bolus properties in patients with Parkinson's disease.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Joeke L NolletDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2240-4271
Per CajanderDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Lara F FerrisDepartment of Human Physiology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jordache RamjithDepartment for Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Taher I OmariDepartment of Human Physiology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-7378
Johanna SavilampiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Flinders University · AUÖrebro University · SERadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives/hypothesisModulation of the pharyngeal swallow to bolus volume and viscosity is important for safe swallowing and is commonly studied using high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM). Use of unidirectional pressure sensor technology may, however, introduce variability in swallow measures and a fixed bolus administration protocol may induce time and order effects. We aimed to overcome these limitations and to investigate the effect of time by repeating randomized measurements using circumferential pressure sensor technology. STUDY

designSub-set analysis of data from the placebo arm of a randomized, repeated measures trial.

methodsHRPM with impedance was recorded using a solid-state catheter with 36 circumferential pressure sensors and 18 impedance segments straddling from hypopharynx to stomach. Testing included triplicates of 5, 10, and 20 ml thin liquid and 10 ml thick liquid boluses, the order of the thin liquid boluses was randomized. The swallow challenges were repeated approximately 10 minutes after finishing the baseline measurement.

resultsWe included 19 healthy adults (10/9 male/female; age 24.5 ± 4.1 year). Intrabolus pressure, all upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening and relaxation metrics, and flow timing metrics increased with larger volumes. A thicker viscosity decreased UES relaxation time, UES basal pressure, and flow timing metrics, whereas UES opening extent increased. Pre-swallow UES basal pressure and post-swallow UES contractile integral decreased over time.

conclusionUsing circumferential pressure sensor technology, the effects of volume and viscosity were largely consistent with previous reports. UES contractile pressures reduced over time. The growing body of literature offers a benchmark for recognizing aberrant pharyngo-esophageal motor responses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1817-1824, 2022.

Indexed as

Esophageal Sphincter, UpperPharynxAdultDeglutitionFemaleHumansMaleManometryPressureViscosityYoung AdultDeglutitiondysphagiahigh-resolution manometryimpedancepharynx

Identifiers

PMID34928519
PMCPMC9545908
OpenAlexW4200488089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.