ArticleInfection2022
Individualizing the use of [
Article in Infection, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of septic metastases in catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia using 18BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: A clinical perspective.Npj imaging · 2024Review
- Validation of a new risk stratification system-based management for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: analysis of a multicentre prospective study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024Article
- Clinically unsuspected orthopedic implants during S. aureus bacteremia do not require additional diagnostic work-up.Infection · 2023Article
- Advanced Imaging for Detection of Foci of Infection in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia- Can a Scan Save Lives?Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- [Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Redefining Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: A structured approach guiding diagnostic and therapeutic management.The Journal of infection · 2023Review
- The impact of follow-up FDG-PET/CT on the management of focal infectious diseases: a retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose[
methodsIn a retrospective single-center cohort study, we included all consecutive adult patients with SAB between 2013 and 2020 if an [
resultsAmong 132 patients included, the original treatment plan was changed after [
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.