ReviewDer Orthopade2022
[Hemitrapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Arthroscopy of the finger and thumb joints, including the thumb saddle joint].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemiresection arthoplasty or partial trapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb is a surgical option in stages 1-3 according to Eaton-Littler classification. Preservation of the intact scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint and maintenance of the length of the thumb is the advantage of this technique. TECHNIQUE: Technically, partial trapeziectomy is only slightly more complex compared to trapeziectomy with or without suspension. An interposition of autologous or allogeneic material is recommended; suspension arthroplasty is also possible in almost all common variants. Despite these theoretical advantages, this technique has not proven advantageous in practice, neither in terms of function nor in terms of time, compared to other techniques. The great advantage of partial trapeziectomy, however, is the wide range of options for revision surgery in the case of persistent complaints.
resultsThe risk of proximalization of the thumb due to an inadequate interposition is generally minor and is usually caused by implant sintering. This can easily be compensated for by implanting a larger graft. Persistent instabilities are the most common cause of persistence of symptoms and can usually be remedied by autologous or allogeneic suspension arthroplasty. In addition, the entire range of endoprosthetics is also possible with a previous spare resection of the trapezium and the possibility of a complete trapeziectomy remains in any case. The obvious theoretical advantages of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy need to be confirmed in practice in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.