ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Menstrual cycle impacts lung structure measures derived from quantitative computed tomography.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thymus Involution across the Human Menstrual Cycle.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Simultaneous high-resolution whole-brain MR spectroscopy and [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Gender Medicine in Clinical Radiology Practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveQuantitative computed tomography (qCT) is being increasingly incorporated in research studies and clinical trials aimed at understanding lung disease risk, progression, exacerbations, and intervention response. Menstrual cycle-based changes in lung function are recognized; however, the impact on qCT measures is currently unknown. We hypothesize that the menstrual cycle impacts qCT-derived measures of lung structure in healthy women and that the degree of measurement change may be mitigated in subjects on cyclic hormonal birth control.
methodsThirty-one non-smoking, healthy women with regular menstrual cycles (16 of which were on cyclic hormonal birth control) underwent pulmonary function testing and qCT imaging at both menses and early luteal phase time points. Data were evaluated to identify lung measurements which changed significantly across the two key time points and to compare degree of change across metrics for the sub-cohort with versus without birth control.
resultsThe segmental airway measurements were larger and mean lung density was higher at menses compared to the early luteal phase. The sub-cohort with cyclic hormonal birth control did not have less evidence of measurement difference over the menstrual cycle compared to the sub-cohort without hormonal birth control.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence that qCT-derived measures from the lung are impacted by the female menstrual cycle. This indicates studies seeking to use qCT as a more sensitive measure of cross-sectional differences or longitudinal changes in these derived lung measurements should consider acquiring data at a consistent time in the menstrual cycle for pre-menopausal women and warrants further exploration. KEY POINTS: • Lung measurements from chest computed tomography are used in multicenter studies exploring lung disease progression and treatment response. • The menstrual cycle impacts lung structure measurements. • Cyclic variability should be considered when evaluating longitudinal change with CT in menstruating women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.