Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34928196›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2021

In-person later abortion accompaniment: a feminist collective-facilitated self-care practice in Latin America.

Chiara Bercu, Heidi Moseson, Julia McReynolds-Pérez, Emily Wilkinson Salamea, Belén Grosso, María Trpin, Ruth Zurbriggen, Carolina Cisternas, Milena Meza, Viviana Díaz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Centring rights-based access to self-care interventions.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chiara BercuSenior Project Manager, Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA. Correspondence: cbercu@ibisreproductivehealth.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8329-8954
Heidi MosesonSenior Research Scientist, Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2488-2429
Julia McReynolds-PérezAssistant Professor, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-2554
Emily Wilkinson SalameaResearcher, Las Comadres, Quito, Ecuador.
Belén GrossoActivist and Researcher, La Colectiva Feminista La Revuelta, Neuquén, Argentina.
María TrpinActivist and Researcher, La Colectiva Feminista La Revuelta, Neuquén, Argentina.
Ruth ZurbriggenActivist and Researcher, La Colectiva Feminista La Revuelta, Neuquén, Argentina.
Carolina CisternasActivist and Researcher, Con las Amigas y en la Casa, Santiago, Chile.
Milena MezaActivist and Researcher, Con las Amigas y en la Casa, Santiago, Chile.
Viviana DíazActivist and Researcher, Con las Amigas y en la Casa, Santiago, Chile.
Katrina KimportAssociate Professor, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-3074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Argentina, Chile and Ecuador, abortion at later durations of pregnancy is legally restricted. Feminist collectives in these contexts support people through self-managed medical abortion outside the healthcare system. The model of in-person abortion accompaniment represents an opportunity to examine a self-care practice that challenges and reimagines abortion provision. We formed a collaborative partnership built on a commitment to shared power and decision-making between researchers and partners. We conducted 28 key informant interviews with accompaniers in Argentina, Chile and Ecuador in 2019 about their model of in-person abortion accompaniment at later durations of pregnancy. We iteratively coded transcripts using a thematic analysis approach. Accompaniers premised their work in a feminist activist framework that understands accompaniment as addressing inequalities and expanding rights, especially for the historically marginalised. Through a detailed description of the process of in-person accompaniment, we show that the model, including the logistical considerations and security mechanisms put in place to ensure favourable abortion outcomes, emphasises peer-to-peer provision of supportive physical and emotional care of the accompanied person. In this way, it represents supported self-care through which individuals are centred as the protagonists of their own abortion, while being accompanied by feminist peers. This model of supported self-care challenges the idea that "self-care" necessarily means "solo care", or care that happens alone. The model's focus on peer-to-peer transfer of knowledge, providing emotional support, and centring the accompanied person not only expands access to abortion, but represents person-centred practices that could be scaled and replicated across contexts.

Indexed as

Self CareArgentinaChileEcuadorHumansLatin Americaaccompanimentlater abortionLatin Americamedical abortionperson-centred careself-careself-managed abortion

Identifiers

PMID34928196
PMCPMC8725943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.