Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34928174›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022

Mathematical evaluation of post-radiotherapy salivary gland function using salivary gland scintigraphy.

Tomohiro Itonaga, Koichi Tokuuye, Ryuji Mikami, Akira Shimizu, Hiroki Sato, Mana Yoshimura, Kiyoaki Tsukahara, Kazuhiro Saito

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Functional Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomohiro ItonagaDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-6843
Koichi TokuuyeDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuji MikamiDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira ShimizuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki SatoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mana YoshimuraDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoaki TsukaharaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro SaitoDepartment of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveXerostomia is the most common treatment-related toxicity after radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck carcinoma, reducing the quality of life of patients due to a decrease in salivary gland function.

methodsSalivary gland scintigraphy was performed to quantitatively evaluate the salivary gland functions in patients undergoing RT. It was done chronologically for 62 salivary glands of 31 patients before RT and retested 12 months later.

resultsThe salivary gland functions of most patients deteriorated post-RT and recovered when the radiation dose to the salivary gland was not high. The mean dose to the salivary gland was found to be the most reliable factor in deteriorating salivary gland function, and the tolerance dose was determined to be 46 Gy. The recovery rate of salivary gland function after 1 year of RT was 72% in the RT alone group (

conclusionScintigraphy revealed that the salivary glands recovered from post-RT hypofunction when decreased doses were administered. The determined tolerance dose of 46 Gy may guide the approach to minimizing associated xerostomia in RT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In this study, the average tolerated dose to the salivary glands was 46 Gy.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveChemoradiotherapyCisplatinFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic IrradiationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedParotid GlandPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyCisplatinRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID34928174
PMCPMC8822577
OpenAlexW4200416328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.