Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927773›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2022

Estimated energy and nutrient intake for infants following baby-led and traditional weaning approaches.

Hannah Rowan, Michelle Lee, Amy Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Early life programming of health and disease: The long-term consequences of obesity in pregnancy.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Estimated energy and nutrient intake for infants following baby-led and traditional weaning approaches.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Article
  15. Complementary feeding: Should baby be leading the way?Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah RowanSchool of Health and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, South Wales, UK.
Michelle LeeSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, South Wales, UK.
Amy BrownSchool of Health and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, South Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0438-0157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBaby-led weaning (BLW), where infants self-feed without the use of spoon-feeding by a caregiver, continues to be a popular approach for starting solids. However, concerns remain amongst health professionals that infants using this method may not consume sufficient energy or nutrients from solid foods. Little research has examined how different weaning approaches shape dietary intake. The present study aimed to use a 3-day weighed diet diary to measure estimated energy and nutrient intake in infants aged 6-12 months.

methodsDiet diaries were completed by 71 parents and analysed to compare estimated infant intake from milk and solid foods for those either following a BLW or traditional spoon-feeding approach (TW). Intake was analysed for each weaning group in two age groups: 26-39 and 40-52 weeks, to account for different eating patterns at the start and end of the weaning process.

resultsFor the younger infants, significant differences in estimated energy intake were found, with TW infants consuming 285 kcal from solid foods compared with 120 kcal for BLW infants. Conversely, BLW infants consumed more calories and nutrients from breast or formula milk, consistent with a slower transition to solid foods. No differences were found in estimated intake amongst older infants, suggesting that BLW infants had 'caught up' with their spoon-fed peers.

conclusionsOverall, few infants regardless of weaning group met recommended intake guidelines for energy (either over or under consuming) with many deficient in iron and zinc intake. The findings are important for those supporting parents through the transition to solid foods.

Indexed as

Infant FoodInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaEatingEnergy IntakeHumansInfantWeaningbaby-led weaningcomplementary feedingenergy intakeinfant feedingnutrient intakeweighed diet diary

Identifiers

PMID34927773
PMCPMC9511768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.