Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927535›Full record

ArticleBioengineered2021

Gut Microbiome-Based Diagnostic Model to Predict Diabetes Mellitus.

Hai-Tao Yang, Jing-Kun Liu, Wen-Juan Xiu, Ting-Ting Tian, Yi Yang, Xian-Geng Hou, Xiang Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fecal Microbiome and Urine Metabolome Profiling of Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hai-Tao YangDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Jing-Kun LiuDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Wen-Juan XiuCollege of Basic Medical Science, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Ting-Ting TianCollege of Basic Medical Science, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yi YangDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Xian-Geng HouDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Xiang XieDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diversity of intestinal microflora and its correlation with clinical parameters in diabetic patients and healthy subjects and to assess the importance of intestinal flora in patients with diabetes. Forty-four patients with diabetes were included. The control group included 47 healthy people. Their data, biochemical indicators and results from 16S rRNA sequencing of their fecal samples were collected. Compared with the healthy population, the intestinal flora of the diabetic patients was obviously abnormal. Within the diabetes group, the abundances of the genera Faecalibacterium, Prevotella, and Roseburia were higher, and the abundances of the genera Shigella and Bifidobacterium were lower. In the correlation analysis between bacteria and clinical indicators, it was found that the genera Veillonella and unclassified_Enterobacteriaceae were negatively related to blood glucose, while the genera Phascolarctobacterium, unidentified_Bacteroidales and Prevotella were significantly positively correlated with fasting blood glucose. Twelve microbial markers were detected in the random forest model, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 84.1%. This index was greater than the diagnostic effect of fasting blood glucose. This was also supported by the joint diagnostic model of microorganisms and clinical indicators. In addition, the intestinal flora significantly improved the diagnosis of diabetes. In conclusion, it can be concluded from these results that intestinal flora is essential for the occurrence and development of diabetes, which seems to be as important as blood glucose itself.

Indexed as

BacteriaDiabetes MellitusFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA genesdiabetesdiagnostic modelfasting blood glucoseIntestinal microorganisms

Identifiers

PMID34927535
PMCPMC8810174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.