Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927469›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Hospital Variation in Time to Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke: What Is the Optimal Target for Improvement?

Sanne J den Hartog, Hester F Lingsma, Pieter-Jan van Doormaal, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Lonneke S F Yo, Charles B L M Majoie, Diederik W J Dippel, Aad van der Lugt, Bob Roozenbeek, MR CLEAN Registry investigators *

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sanne J den HartogDepartment of Neurology Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1650-951X
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2063-9533
Pieter-Jan van DoormaalDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7398-2864
Jeannette HofmeijerDepartment of Neurology Rijnstate Arnhem the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-5674
Lonneke S F YoDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Catharina Hospital Eindhoven the Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7600-9568
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9234-3515
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6159-2228
Bob RoozenbeekDepartment of Neurology Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8320-8303
MR CLEAN Registry investigators *
Erasmus MC · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Time to reperfusion in patients with ischemic stroke is strongly associated with functional outcome and may differ between hospitals and between patients within hospitals. Improvement in time to reperfusion can be guided by between-hospital and within-hospital comparisons and requires insight in specific targets for improvement. We aimed to quantify the variation in door-to-reperfusion time between and within Dutch intervention hospitals and to assess the contribution of different time intervals to this variation. Methods and Results We used data from the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) Registry. The door-to-reperfusion time was subdivided into time intervals, separately for direct patients (door-to-computed tomography, computed tomography-to-computed tomography angiography [CTA], CTA-to-groin, and groin-to-reperfusion times) and for transferred patients (door-to-groin and groin-to-reperfusion times). We used linear mixed models to distinguish the variation in door-to-reperfusion time between hospitals and between patients. The proportional change in variance was used to estimate the amount of variance explained by each time interval. We included 2855 patients of 17 hospitals providing endovascular treatment. Of these patients, 44% arrived directly at an endovascular treatment hospital. The between-hospital variation in door-to-reperfusion time was 9%, and the within-hospital variation was 91%. The contribution of case-mix variables on the variation in door-to-reperfusion time was marginal (2%-7%). Of the between-hospital variation, CTA-to-groin time explained 83%, whereas groin-to-reperfusion time explained 15%. Within-hospital variation was mostly explained by CTA-to-groin time (33%) and groin-to-reperfusion time (42%). Similar results were found for transferred patients. Conclusions Door-to-reperfusion time varies between, but even more within, hospitals providing endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. Quality of stroke care improvements should not only be guided by between-hospital comparisons, but also aim to reduce variation between patients within a hospital, and should specifically focus on CTA-to-groin time and groin-to-reperfusion time.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeHospitalsHumansThrombectomyTreatment Outcomebrain ischemiaquality improvementreperfusionstrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID34927469
PMCPMC9075196
OpenAlexW4200212429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.