Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927213›Full record

Trial reportProgress in orthodontics2021

The effect of two different types of forces on possible root resorption in relation to dentin phosphoprotein levels: a single-blind, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.

Sherifa Ghaleb, Nazla Tamish, Walid ElKenany, Myriam Guindi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Progress in orthodontics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04825665 (The Effect of Two Different Types of Forces on Possible Root Resorption in Relation to Dentin Phosphoprotein Levels), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04825665 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Two Different Types of Forces on Possible Root Resorption in Relation to Dentin Phosphoprotein Levels: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSherifa GhalebRan2020 to 2021Enrolled8ConditionsRoot ResorptionArmsContinuous force, Intermittent force
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sherifa GhalebDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champolion street, Azarita, Egypt. sherifaadel.dent@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3591-8500
Nazla TamishDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champolion street, Azarita, Egypt.
Walid ElKenanyDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champolion street, Azarita, Egypt.
Myriam GuindiDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University. Champolion Street, Azarita, Egypt.
Alexandria University · EGAlexion Pharma (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this 2-arm-parallel split-mouth trial was to evaluate and compare the extent of possible root resorption using dentin phosphoprotein levels in gingival crevicular fluid between controlled continuous and intermittent orthodontic force groups. MATERIALS AND

methodsA sample of 16 maxillary first premolars from 8 patients requiring bilateral extractions of the upper first premolars as part of their orthodontic treatment were recruited. A buccally directed continuous force of 150 g, reactivated after 28 days, was applied to the upper first premolar on one side for 8 weeks. On the contralateral first premolar, a buccally directed intermittent force (21 days on, 7 days off) of the same magnitude was applied for the same period. Gingival crevicular fluid samples were collected at the beginning of the study, 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th week, and at the end of the study to quantify and compare dentin phosphoprotein levels in both groups.

resultsDentin phosphoprotein levels showed a higher concentration in the continuous force group than the intermittent force group in week 4 and 8 of sample collection; where the differences were statistically significant (95% CI 0.007-0.14; P < .04) and (95% CI 0.02-0.17; P < .04) respectively. No harm was observed.

conclusionsDentin phosphoprotein was found to be a useful early biomarker to detect and monitor root resorption, showing that the application of an intermittent orthodontic force caused less root resorption than a continuous force.

trial registrationNCT04825665 ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered 1 April 2021-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04825665 .

Indexed as

Root ResorptionDentin SialophosphoproteinExtracellular Matrix ProteinsHumansMouthPhosphoproteinsSialoglycoproteinsSingle-Blind MethodDentin SialophosphoproteinExtracellular Matrix ProteinsPhosphoproteinsSialoglycoproteinsContinuous forceDentine phosphoproteinGingival crevicular fluidIntermittent forceRoot resorption

Identifiers

PMID34927213
PMCPMC8685187
OpenAlexW4200313679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.