Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927206›Full record

ArticleOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2022

Physical work exposure matrix for use in the UK Biobank.

E L Yanik, M J Stevens, E Clare Harris, K E Walker-Bone, A M Dale, Y Ma, G A Colditz, B A Evanoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Occupational demands associated with rotator cuff disease surgery in the UK Biobank.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

E L YanikDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5835-0201
M J StevensMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
E Clare HarrisMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
K E Walker-BoneMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-1459
A M DaleDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Y MaDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
G A ColditzDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
B A EvanoffDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

DEVELOPING A GENERAL POPULATION JOB EXPOSURE MATRIX FOR STUDIES OF WORK-RELATED MSDR01OH011076 · OH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2016 to 2018
$988k
GENETIC AND NON-GENETIC RISK FACTORS FOR ROTATOR CUFF DISEASEK01AR073318 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YANIK, ELIZABETH LEE · 2019 to 2022
$549k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_15015Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_PC_21002Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/5NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR073318NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH011076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUK Biobank (UKB) is a large prospective cohort capturing numerous health outcomes, but limited occupational information (job title, self-reported manual work and occupational walking/standing).

aimsTo create and evaluate validity of a linkage between UKB and a job exposure matrix for physical work exposures based on the US Occupational Information Network (O*NET) database.

methodsJob titles and UK Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes were collected during UKB baseline assessment visits. Using existing crosswalks, UK SOC codes were mapped to US SOC codes allowing linkage to O*NET variables capturing numerous dimensions of physical work. Job titles with the highest O*NET scores were assessed to evaluate face validity. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to compare O*NET scores to self-reported UKB measures.

resultsAmong 324 114 participants reporting job titles, 323 936 were linked to O*NET. Expected relationships between scores and self-reported measures were observed. For static strength (0-7 scale), the median O*NET score was 1.0 (e.g. audiologists), with a highest score of 4.88 for stone masons and a positive correlation with self-reported heavy manual work (Spearman's coefficient = 0.50). For time spent standing (1-5 scale), the median O*NET score was 2.72 with a highest score of 5 for cooks and a positive correlation with self-reported occupational walking/standing (Spearman's coefficient = 0.56).

conclusionsWhile most jobs were not physically demanding, a wide range of physical work values were assigned to a diverse set of jobs. This novel linkage of a job exposure matrix to UKB provides a potentially valuable tool for understanding relationships between occupational exposures and disease.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksOccupational ExposureHumansOccupationsProspective StudiesUnited KingdomEpidemiologic measurementsjob descriptionoccupational exposurevalidation study

Identifiers

PMID34927206
PMCPMC8863087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.