Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927192›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardiovascular nursing2022

The COVID-19 pandemic as experienced by adults with congenital heart disease from Belgium, Norway, and South Korea: impact on life domains, patient-reported outcomes, and experiences with care.

Philip Moons, Eva Goossens, Koen Luyckx, Adrienne H Kovacs, Brith Andresen, Ju Ryoung Moon, Alexander Van De Bruaene, Jessica Rassart, Liesbet Van Bulck, APPROACH-IS II consortium and ISACHD

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardiovascular nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experiences of People with Cardiovascular Disease during COVID-19 in Sweden: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philip MoonsKU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-4516
Eva GoossensKU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-5256
Koen LuyckxKU Leuven School Psychology and Development in Context, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8862-5598
Adrienne H KovacsKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2687-0384
Brith AndresenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-9757
Ju Ryoung MoonDepartment of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4285-0295
Alexander Van De BruaeneCongenital and Structural Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0469-8640
Jessica RassartResearch Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8535-1499
Liesbet Van BulckKU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8975-4455
APPROACH-IS II consortium and ISACHD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses significant challenges to many groups within societies, and especially for people with chronic health conditions. It is, however, unknown whether and how the pandemic has thus far affected the physical and mental health of patient populations. Therefore, we investigated how the pandemic affected the lives of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), compared pre- and peri-pandemic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and a patient-reported experience measure (PREM), and investigated whether having had COVID-19 impacted pre-/peri-pandemic differences of the PROMs and PREM. METHODS AND

resultsAs part of the ongoing APPROACH-IS II project, we longitudinally surveyed 716 adults with CHD from Belgium, Norway, and South Korea. Pre-pandemic measures were administered from August 2019 to February 2020 and the peri-pandemic surveys were completed September 2020-April 2021. The majority of patients indicated that their social lives (80%), mental health (58%), and professional lives/education (51%) were negatively impacted by the pandemic. Patients felt worried (65%), were afraid (55%), reported the pandemic felt 'close' to them (53%), and were stressed (52%). However, differences between pre- and peri-pandemic scores on the PROMs and PREM were negligibly small (Cohen's d < 0.20). Across measures, 5.8-15.8% of patients demonstrated changes (improved or worsened scores) that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. There were no difference-in-differences for PROMs and PREM between patients who did vs. did not have COVID-19.

conclusionsAlthough the COVID-19 pandemic has been disruptive in many ways, pre- to peri-pandemic changes in PROMs and PREM of adults with CHD were negligibly small.

Indexed as

COVID-19Heart Defects, CongenitalAdultBelgiumHumansPandemicsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRepublic of KoreaCOVID-19DepressionHeart defect congenitalPandemicPatient-reported outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID34927192
PMCPMC8755276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.