Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927172›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational pathology2021

Liver Involvement by Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Systematic Review.

Jingjing Jiao, Lanjing Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingjing JiaoDepartment of Pathology, Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4308-0587
Lanjing ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5436-887X
University Medical Center of Princeton · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Chang S Chan · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveLiver penetration by a confined perforation of peptic ulcer is a rare but severe event. Its clinical and pathological features are unclear.

methodsIn total, 41 qualified English publications were identified using the PubMed database and one in-house case.

resultsAmong the 42 patients, 20 patients had liver involvement by a perforated duodenal ulcer and 22 by a gastric ulcer. Among the 23 cases of known ulcer histology, 2 ulcers were malignant and were adenocarcinomas in the gastric remnant and the remaining 21 ulcers were confirmed as histologically benign (for frequency of malignancy in duodenal versus gastric ulcers,

conclusionsCareful histologic examination, clinicopathological correlation, and immunohistochemistry are critical to establish the diagnosis and avoid misdiagnosing liver involvement as malignancy.

Indexed as

Duodenal ulcerGastric ulcerLiver penetrationPeptic hepatitis

Identifiers

PMID34927172
PMCPMC8681229
OpenAlexW3165911961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.