Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927169›Full record

ArticleAdvanced nanobiomed research2021

Extracellular Vesicles as Drug Delivery System for Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders: Optimization of the Cell Source.

Matthew J Haney, Yuling Zhao, John K Fallon, Wang Yue, Samuel M Li, Emily E Lentz, Dorothy Erie, Philip C Smith, Elena V Batrakova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced nanobiomed research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Extracellular vesicles as tools and targets in therapy for diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew J HaneyCenter for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Yuling ZhaoCenter for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
John K FallonEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Wang YueEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Samuel M LiEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Emily E LentzCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Dorothy ErieCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Philip C SmithEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Elena V BatrakovaCenter for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Cell-based Platform for Gene Delivery to the BrainR01NS102412 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BATRAKOVA, ELENA · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Extracellular Vesicles for CNS Delivery of Therapeutic Enzymes to Treat Lysosomal Storage DisordersR01NS112019 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BATRAKOVA, ELENA · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Shared UPLC-MS/MS for Absolute Quantitative ProteomicsS10RR024595 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, PHILIP C · 2008 to 2008
$381k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR024595NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102412NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) represent a next generation drug delivery system that combines nanoparticle size with extraordinary ability to cross biological barriers, reduced immunogenicity, and low offsite toxicity profiles. A successful application of this natural way of delivering biological compounds requires deep understanding EVs intrinsic properties inherited from their parent cells. Herein, we evaluated EVs released by cells of different origin, with respect to drug delivery to the brain for treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. The morphology, size, and zeta potential of EVs secreted by primary macrophages (mEVs), neurons (nEVs), and astrocytes (aEVs) were examined by nanoparticle NTA, DLS, cryoTEM, and AFM. Spherical nanoparticles with average size 110-130 nm and zeta potential around -20 mV were identified for all EVs types. mEVs showed the highest levels of tetraspanins and integrins compared to nEVs and aEVs, suggesting superior adhesion and targeting to the inflamed tissues by mEVs. Strikingly, aEVs were preferentially taken up by neuronal cells

Indexed as

cell sourcedrug deliveryextracellular vesiclesneuroinflammationParkinson’s diseasetargeted proteomics

Identifiers

PMID34927169
PMCPMC8680291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.