ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2021
Transgene-free Genome Editing in Plants.
Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing for enhancing grain quality traits in rice (Plant signaling & behavior · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Cas systems for enhancing chilling tolerance in rice: recent advances and future prospects.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Next-generation CRISPR systems and advanced delivery paradigms for precision crop improvement: a comparative case study in sugar beet (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Beyond GMOs: transgene-free gene-edited crops for global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Methylviologen resistance in loss-of-function mutants of the polyamine transporter gene OsLAT5.PloS one · 2026Article
- From QTL mapping to genome editing: advances and integrated strategies for improving aluminum tolerance in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Balancing nature and technology: enhancing flowering in ornamental plants.Botanical studies · 2025Review
- Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- T-DNA orientation, distance between two T-DNAs, and the transformation target cells significantly impact vector backbone integration and efficiency of generating marker-free transgenic plants in a co-transformation system.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Advances in Genome Editing Through Haploid Induction Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- A long journey towards genome editing technologies in plants: a technical and critical review of genome editing technologies.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Improving transformation and regeneration efficiency in medicinal plants: insights from other recalcitrant species.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Enhancing quality and climate resilient traits in vegetatively propagated polyploids: transgenic and genome editing advancements, challenges and future directions.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Engineering tomato disease resistance by manipulating susceptibility genes.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Application of a multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 strategy for elimination of selection markers from transgenic plants.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
- Killing two birds with one stone: A breakthrough in transgene-free gene editing in soybean.Plant physiology · 2024Article
- Identification of a highly efficient chloroplast-targeting peptide for plastid engineering.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Optimization of CRISPR-Cas9 system iniScience · 2024Article
- Simultaneous Application of Several Exogenous dsRNAs for the Regulation of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing is widely used across plant species to generate and study the impact of functional mutations in crop improvement. However, transgene integration in plant genomes raises important legislative concerns regarding genetically modified organisms. Several strategies have been developed to remove or prevent the integration of gene editor constructs, which can be divided into three major categories: 1) elimination of transgenic sequences via genetic segregation; 2) transient editor expression from DNA vectors; and 3) DNA-independent editor delivery, including RNA or preassembled Cas9 protein-gRNA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs). Here, we summarize the main strategies employed to date and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using these different tools. We hope that our work can provide important information concerning the value of alternative genome editing strategies to advance crop breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.