Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34927037›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Ethnic inequalities in health intervention coverage among Mexican women at the individual and municipality levels.

Nancy Armenta-Paulino, Fernando C Wehrmeister, Luisa Arroyave, Aluísio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Relationship between Health Inequalities and Breast Cancer Survival in Mexican Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy Armenta-PaulinoInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, 1160, 3rd floor. 96020-220, Pelotas, Brazil.
Fernando C WehrmeisterInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, 1160, 3rd floor. 96020-220, Pelotas, Brazil.
Luisa ArroyaveInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, 1160, 3rd floor. 96020-220, Pelotas, Brazil.
Aluísio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, 1160, 3rd floor. 96020-220, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, 1160, 3rd floor. 96020-220, Pelotas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing data from Mexico, the country with the largest indigenous population in Latin America, we describe ethnic inequalities in coverage with women's health interventions at individual and municipal levels.

methodsCross-sectional study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2018 and the Mexican Intercensal Survey 2015. We selected five outcomes: modern contraceptive use, content-qualified antenatal care (ANCq), and skilled birth attendant (SBA) for women aged 15-49 years; Pap smear test and mammogram among women aged 25-64 and 40-69 years respectively. Municipalities were classified into three groups by the percentage of indigenous population: <10%, 10% - 39%, and ≥40%. We calculated crude and adjusted coverage ratios (CR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Poisson regression.

findingsWomen living in municipalities with indigenous population ≥40% were poorer, less educated, and more rural. Coverage was lower for indigenous than non-indigenous for modern contraceptive use (CR: 0·73; CI 0·65-0·83), ANCq (CR: 0·72; CI 0·62-0·83), SBA (CR: 0·83; CI 0·77-0·90) and undergoing a mammogram (CR: 0·54; CI 0·41-0·71), but not for Pap smears (CR: 0·94; CI 0·83-1·07). Coverage with the five interventions increased as the municipal proportions of indigenous population decreased, both for indigenous and non-indigenous women. Coverage gaps at municipal level tended to be wider than at individual level.

interpretationBoth indigenous and non-indigenous women living in municipalities with high proportions of indigenous people were systematically excluded from reproductive and maternal interventions. Our findings suggest that social and health interventions targeted at the individual level should be complemented by structural interventions in municipalities with high proportions of indigenous people, including strengthening health and social services.

Indexed as

ethnic inequalitiesIndigenousMéxicoSDGswomen's health

Identifiers

PMID34927037
PMCPMC8649218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.