ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022
Ethnic inequalities in health intervention coverage among Mexican women at the individual and municipality levels.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The feasibility of a dietary and lifestyle behaviour change intervention among low-income Latinas and Indigenous Mexicans in rural desert communities: a pilot randomised controlled trial.Public health nutrition · 2026Trial
- Healthcare Access for Older Indigenous Women in Latin America: A Scoping Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Knowledge Gaps.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Epidemiology of children and adolescents undergoing surgery at Mexican public hospitals: a retrospective registry-based analysis from 2010 to 2022.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Preventable mortality in Mexico: bridging gaps in chronic disease and ageing care.BMJ global health · 2026Review
- Trends and Determinants of Dementia-Related Mortality in Mexico, 2017-2023.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic inequalities in the continuum of care for maternal health in an upper-middle-income country: the case of Mexico.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
- Article
- Ethnic inequalities and contraception in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Beyond disease burden: the urgent need to address maternal health disparities among Indigenous populations in Latin America.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Inequities in the continuum of maternal care in Mexico: trends before and after COVID-19.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Health disparities among indigenous populations in Latin America: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Inequalities in health system coverage and quality: a cross-sectional survey of four Latin American countries.The Lancet. Global health · 2024Review
- Relationship between Health Inequalities and Breast Cancer Survival in Mexican Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Reduction in contraceptive use during the COVID-19 pandemic among women in an indigenous Mexican community: a retrospective crossover study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUsing data from Mexico, the country with the largest indigenous population in Latin America, we describe ethnic inequalities in coverage with women's health interventions at individual and municipal levels.
methodsCross-sectional study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2018 and the Mexican Intercensal Survey 2015. We selected five outcomes: modern contraceptive use, content-qualified antenatal care (ANCq), and skilled birth attendant (SBA) for women aged 15-49 years; Pap smear test and mammogram among women aged 25-64 and 40-69 years respectively. Municipalities were classified into three groups by the percentage of indigenous population: <10%, 10% - 39%, and ≥40%. We calculated crude and adjusted coverage ratios (CR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Poisson regression.
findingsWomen living in municipalities with indigenous population ≥40% were poorer, less educated, and more rural. Coverage was lower for indigenous than non-indigenous for modern contraceptive use (CR: 0·73; CI 0·65-0·83), ANCq (CR: 0·72; CI 0·62-0·83), SBA (CR: 0·83; CI 0·77-0·90) and undergoing a mammogram (CR: 0·54; CI 0·41-0·71), but not for Pap smears (CR: 0·94; CI 0·83-1·07). Coverage with the five interventions increased as the municipal proportions of indigenous population decreased, both for indigenous and non-indigenous women. Coverage gaps at municipal level tended to be wider than at individual level.
interpretationBoth indigenous and non-indigenous women living in municipalities with high proportions of indigenous people were systematically excluded from reproductive and maternal interventions. Our findings suggest that social and health interventions targeted at the individual level should be complemented by structural interventions in municipalities with high proportions of indigenous people, including strengthening health and social services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.