ArticleACS omega2021
Machine-Learning-Assisted Analysis of Colorimetric Assays on Paper Analytical Devices.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Analytical Chemistry: Current Trends and Future Directions.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2026Review
- ChatGPT based method for obtaining repeatable and quantitative colorimetric measurements.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Wearable Sensing Technologies for the Management of Cancer, Diabetes, and COVID-19.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Accuracy Enhancement in Refractive Index Sensing via Full-Spectrum Machine Learning Modeling.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Smartphone-Compatible Colorimetric Detection of CA19-9 Using Melanin Nanoparticles and Deep Learning.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Machine-Learning-Aided Advanced Electrochemical Biosensors.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- A Unified YOLOv8 Approach for Point-of-Care Diagnostics of SalivaryBiosensors · 2025Article
- An ensemble model of machine learning regression techniques and color spaces integrated with a color sensor: application to color-changing biochemical assays.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Revolutionary Point-of-Care Wearable Diagnostics for Early Disease Detection and Biomarker Discovery through Intelligent Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Colorimetric sensing for translational applications: from colorants to mechanisms.Chemical Society reviews · 2024Review
- Simple colorimetric paper-based test strip for point-of-use quality testing of ethanol-based hand sanitizers.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Machine learning assisted biosensing technology: An emerging powerful tool for improving the intelligence of food safety detection.Current research in food science · 2024Review
- Region of interest selection in heterogeneous digital image: Wine age prediction by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography.Current research in food science · 2024Article
- Paper-based sensors for bacteria detection.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023Review
- Machine Learning-Based Analytical Systems: Food Forensics.ACS omega · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paper-based analytical devices (PADs) employing colorimetric detection and smartphone images have gained wider acceptance in a variety of measurement applications. PADs are primarily meant to be used in field settings where assay and imaging conditions greatly vary, resulting in less accurate results. Recently, machine-learning (ML)-assisted models have been used in image analysis. We evaluated a combination of four ML models-logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, and artificial neural network (ANN)-as well as three image color spaces, RGB, HSV, and LAB, for their ability to accurately predict analyte concentrations. We used images of PADs taken at varying lighting conditions, with different cameras and users for food color and enzyme inhibition assays to create training and test datasets. The prediction accuracy was higher for food color than enzyme inhibition assays in most of the ML models and color space combinations. All models better predicted coarse-level classifications than fine-grained concentration classes. ML models using the sample color along with a reference color increased the models' ability to predict the result in which the reference color may have partially factored out the variation in ambient assay and imaging conditions. The best concentration class prediction accuracy obtained for food color was 0.966 when using the ANN model and LAB color space. The accuracy for enzyme inhibition assay was 0.908 when using the SVM model and LAB color space. Appropriate models and color space combinations can be useful to analyze large numbers of samples on PADs as a powerful low-cost quick field-testing tool.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.