ArticleOptica2020
Spatial frequency modulated imaging in coherent anti-Stokes Raman microscopy.
Article in Optica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperspectral acquisition with ScanImage at the single pixel level: application to time domain coherent Raman imaging.Optics express · 2024Article
- Statistical estimation theory detection limits for label-free imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- To label or not: the need for validation in label-free imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Cascaded domain multiphoton spatial frequency modulation imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Video-rate Raman-based metabolic imaging by Airy light-sheet illumination and photon-sparse detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Compressed sensing in the far-field of the spatial light modulator in high noise conditions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Simplified Near-Degenerate Four-Wave-Mixing Microscopy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For sparse samples or in the presence of ambient light, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) performance of single-point-scanning coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) images is not optimized. As an improvement, we propose replacing the conventional CARS focus-point illumination with a periodically structured focus line while continuing to collect the transmitted CARS intensity on a single detector. The object information along the illuminated line is obtained by numerically processing the CARS signal recorded for various periods of the structured focus line. We demonstrate experimentally the feasibility of this spatial frequency modulated imaging (SPIFI) in CARS (SPIFI-CARS) and SHG (SPIFI-SHG) and identify situations where its SNR is better than that of the single-point-scanning approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.