Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926674›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2021

Long-term and short-term prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index in cancer: a narrative review.

Li Yan, Tomoki Nakamura, Andrea Casadei-Gardini, Gema Bruixola, Yuan-Lan Huang, Zhi-De Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prognostic Value of HALP and PNI Scores in Predicting 6-Month Mortality Among Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li YanDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Tomoki NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu-city, Mie, Japan.
Andrea Casadei-GardiniUniversità Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Hospital-IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Gema BruixolaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Yuan-Lan HuangDepartment of Special Food and Equipment, Naval Special Medical Center, the Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-De HuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo perform a narrative review of the prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in cancers.

backgroundPrognostic estimation greatly determines the treatment approach in various cancers. The PNI, calculated using the serum albumin level and total lymphocyte count, is a useful indicator to assess nutritional and immunological conditions. The PNI represents a low-cost, easy-to-perform, noninvasive, rapid, and standardized tool for estimating the prognosis of cancer. Many studies have aimed to clarify the prognostic value of PNI for various types of cancer.

methodsWe summarize the studies, particularly the systematic reviews and meta-analyses, that have examined the prognostic value of PNI in common cancers.

conclusionsThe relevant studies indicate that low PNI is an independent prognostic factor for decreasing overall survival in many types of cancers. Disease-free survival and progression-free survival were also associated with PNI in some types of cancer including lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, we suggest that the measurement of PNI is a useful method to identify cancer patients that have a worse prognosis and that the treatment strategy for these patients be adjusted accordingly. We hypothesize that maintaining good nutritional status during treatment may improve outcomes of various cancers.

Indexed as

cancerprognosisPrognostic nutrition index (PNI)review

Identifiers

PMID34926674
PMCPMC8640913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.