Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926666›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Detection of dental caries in oral photographs taken by mobile phones based on the YOLOv3 algorithm.

Baichen Ding, Zhuo Zhang, Yiran Liang, Weiwei Wang, Siwei Hao, Ze Meng, Lian Guan, Ying Hu, Bin Guo, Runlian Zhao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Baichen Ding *Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.
Zhuo Zhang *The College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China.
Yiran LiangDepartment of Endodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital and School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Weiwei WangThe College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China.
Siwei HaoDepartment of Stomatology, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ze MengDepartment of Stomatology, Handan First Hospital, Handan, China.
Lian GuanDepartment of Stomatology, Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ying HuBeijing Institute of Dental Research, Beijing Stomatological Hospital and School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Bin GuoDepartment of Stomatology, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Runlian ZhaoThe College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China.
Yan LvBeijing Institute of Dental Research, Beijing Stomatological Hospital and School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to explore the value of using the YOLOv3 algorithm for detection and diagnosis of dental caries in oral photographs taken with mobile phones.

methodsOral photographs taken with the mobile phones of 570 patients were used as 3 datasets: the augmented images (n=3,990), the enhanced images (n=3,990), and the combined augmented and enhanced images (n=7,980). Oral photographs taken by mobile phones from another 70 patients were used as an independent test set. We used the YOLOv3 network for migration learning for modelling. Diagnostic precision, recall, F1-score, and mean average precision (mAP) were calculated to obtain the detection and diagnostic performance of the YOLOv3 algorithm.

resultsAfter 3 independent training, the mAP value of the original group YOLOv3 algorithm was 56.20%, in which the precision for primary caries recognition was 76.92%, recall was 49.59%, and F1-score was 0.60; the precision for secondary caries recognition was 91.67%, recall was 52.38%, and F1-score was 0.67. The mAP value of the enhance group algorithm was 66.69%, in which the precision for primary caries identification was 81.82%, recall was 52.07%, and F1-score was 0.64, and the precision for secondary caries identification was 100%, recall was 33.33%, and F1-score was 0.50. The mAP value of the comprehensive group algorithm was 85.48%, in which the precision for primary caries identification was 93.33%, recall was 69.42%, F1-score was 0.80, and the F1-score for secondary caries identification was 0.50; precision was 100%, recall was 52.38%, and F1-score was 0.69.

conclusionsThe caries detection capability based on the YOLOv3 algorithm highlights the potential utility of deep learning in caries detection and diagnosis. Comparing the 3 experiments, the detection of the model trained after using image augmented and enhancement techniques was significantly improved.

Indexed as

Dental cariesimage recognitionoral imagesYOLOv3 algorithm

Identifiers

PMID34926666
PMCPMC8640896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.