ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc and Facet Joint Degeneration Using Histogram Analysis of T2 and T2* Values.JOR spine · 2025Article
- The volumetric ADC histogram analysis in differentiating stage IA endometrial carcinoma from endometrial polyp.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography for measuring split kidney function in pediatric patients with hydronephrosis: comparison with renal scintigraphy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Noninvasive assessment of renal function and fibrosis in CKD patients using histogram analysis based on diffusion kurtosis imaging.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high, and is easy to develop into end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which requires kidney dialysis or kidney transplantation. Therefore, we want to explore the clinical value of magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses (SLEEK) in assessing renal function in the early stage.
methodsOne hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent abdominal MRI examination, including a coronal SLEEK sequence. The patients were divided into the control group [CG, 47 cases, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >90], the mild renal function impairment (mRI) group (48 cases, eGFR =60-90), and the moderate to severe renal function impairment (m-sRI) group (34 cases, eGFR <60). Two experienced radiologists delineated cortex and medulla regions of interest (ROIs) on SLEEK images to obtain cortex and medulla quantitative histogram parameters [Mean, Median, Percentiles (5
resultsFour histogram parameters (Inhomogeneity
conclusionsQuantitative histogram parameters based on a SLEEK sequence can be used to supplement renal dysfunction assessment. Cortex histogram parameters are more valuable for evaluating renal function than medulla histogram parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.