Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926373›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Virtual Coaching for Rehabilitation: The Participatory Design Experience of the vCare Project.

Agnese Seregni, Enrica Tricomi, Peppino Tropea, Rocio Del Pino, Juan Carlos Gómez-Esteban, Inigo Gabilondo, María Díez-Cirarda, Hannes Schlieter, Kai Gand, Massimo Corbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Motivation as a Measurable Outcome in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agnese SeregniDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Enrica TricomiInstitut für Technische Informatik (ZITI), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peppino TropeaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Rocio Del PinoNeurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Juan Carlos Gómez-EstebanNeurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Inigo GabilondoNeurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
María Díez-CirardaNeurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Hannes SchlieterFaculty of Business and Economics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Kai GandFaculty of Business and Economics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Massimo CorboDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-user involvement constitutes an essential goal during the development of innovative solution, not only for the evaluation, but also in codesign, following a user-centered strategy. Indeed, it is a great asset of research to base the work in a user-centered approach, because it allows to build a platform that will respond to the real needs of users. The aims of this work are to present the methodology adopted to involve end-users (i.e., neurological patients, healthy elderly, and health professionals) in the evaluation of a novel virtual coaching system based on the personalized clinical pathways and to present the results obtained from these preliminary activities. Specific activities involving end-users were planned along the development phases and are referred to as participatory design. The user experience of participatory design is constituted by the two different phases: the "end-user's perspective" phase where the user involvement in experiential activities is from an observational point of view, whereas the "field study" phase is the direct participation in these activities. Evaluation tools (i.e., scales, questionnaires, and interviews) were planned to assess different aspects of the system. Thirty patients [14 with poststroke condition and 16 with Parkinson's disease (PD)], 13 healthy elderly, and six health professionals were enrolled from two clinical centers during the two phases of participatory design. Results from "end-user's perspective" phase showed globally a positive preliminary perception of the service. Overall, a positive evaluation (i.e., UEQ median score > 1) was obtained for each domain of the scale in both groups of patients and healthy subjects. The evaluation of the vCare system during the "field study" phase was assessed as excellent (>80 points) from the point of view of both patients and health professionals. According to the majority of patients, the rehabilitation service through the solution was reported to be interesting, engaging, entertaining, challenging and useful for improving impaired motor functions, and making patients aware of their cognitive abilities. Once refined and fine-tuned in the aspects highlighted in the this work, the system will be clinically tested at user's home to measure the real impact of the rehabilitative coaching services.

Indexed as

MentoringAgedHumansMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesUser-Computer InterfaceParkinson's diseaserehabilitationstrokeusability and user experienceuser-centered designvirtual coaching

Identifiers

PMID34926373
PMCPMC8674451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.