ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA in cerebrospinal fluid for detecting gene mutations in central nervous system lymphoma patients.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanism of TRAF6 in Malignant Proliferation of Human NK/T Cell Lymphoma Cell HANK1.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Bromodomain proteins as potential therapeutic targets for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Cell & bioscience · 2024Review
- The Value of Cell-Free Circulating DNA Profiling in Patients with Skin Diseases.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Circulating tumor DNA mutation profile is associated with the prognosis and treatment response of Chinese patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMounting studies have sought to identify novel mutation biomarkers having diagnostic and prognostic potentials. Nevertheless, the understanding of the mutated pathways related to development and prognosis of B-cell lymphoma is still lacking. We aimed to comprehensively analyze the mutation alterations in genes of canonical signaling pathways and their impacts on the clinic outcomes of patients with B-cell lymphoma.
methodsCirculating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from 79 patients with B-cell lymphomas were used for targeted sequencing with a 560-gene panel for depicting mutation landscapes and identifying gene fusion events. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional enrichment analyses of mutated genes were performed. The associations of mutation status of genes and seven canonical oncogenic pathways with progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier test and multivariate Cox analysis. The variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of genes in TP53 and Hippo pathways in paired baseline and post-treatment samples from 18 B-cell lymphoma patients were compared. Finally, the associations of identified fusion genes, mutated genes, and pathways with treatment response were evaluated based on objective response rates (ORRs) comparisons of groups.
resultsWe identified 666 mutations from 262 genes in baseline cfDNAs from 79 B-cell lymphoma patients, and found some genes were preferentially mutated in our cohort such as
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.