Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926201›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2021

Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Samuele Gigliola, Giancarlo Sborgia, Alfredo Niro, Carmela Palmisano, Pasquale Puzo, Gianluigi Giuliani, Luigi Sborgia, Dario Sisto, Valentina Pastore, Claudio Furino and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samuele GigliolaEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Giancarlo SborgiaEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Alfredo NiroEye Clinic, Hospital "SS. Annunziata", ASL Taranto, Taranto 74121, Italy.
Carmela PalmisanoEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Pasquale PuzoEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Gianluigi GiulianiEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Luigi SborgiaEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Dario SistoEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Valentina PastoreEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Claudio FurinoEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Rossella DonghiaNational Institute of Gastroenterology "S. de Bellis" Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte 70013, Italy.
Alessandra SborgiaEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Francesco BosciaEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Giovanni AlessioEye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITGastroenterology Hospital "Saverio de Bellis" · ITOspedale SS. Annunziata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare perioperative parameters of one-handed rotational phacoemulsification technique (one-handed phaco-roll) with each of other two techniques, "Divide et Conquer" and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

methodsIn this retrospective and comparative cohort study, eyes with uncomplicated cataract (nuclear density grade 2 to 3) treated routinely with one-handed phaco-roll (

resultsAspiration and surgical time, and BSS used were lower in Group 1 (

conclusionOne-handed phaco-roll seems to be less time-consuming than "Divide et Conquer" and FLACS and less energy-consuming than "Divide et Conquer". Furthermore, one-handed phaco-roll seems to have an equal safety profile compared to the other two techniques.

Indexed as

cataract surgeryDivide et Conquerfemtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeryone-handed phacoemulsificationphaco-rolling

Identifiers

PMID34926201
PMCPMC8640782
OpenAlexW3217110197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.