ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2021
Current state of hybrid solutions for aortic arch aneurysms.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of techniques for left subclavian artery preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of both endovascular and surgical revascularization.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of hybrid surgery in the treatment of aortic arch disease: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Open, Hybrid and Endovascular Management of Aortic Arch Aneurysms: Recent Updates and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy evaluation and parametric study of the novel concave triple branched stent graft system based on hemodynamic analysis of first-in-man cases.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Novel use of the intra-aortic balloon occlusion device in a complex anatomy after hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- Anesthetic Considerations for Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta.Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2025Review
- Clamshell thoracosternotomy for single-stage repair of select aortic arch pathologies.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Patient-Tailored Therapy for Complex Aortic Arch Anatomy: An Evolving Research Field with Custom-Made Solutions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Tailored surgical strategies for mini-access open total arch repair.JTCVS techniques · 2024Article
- Article
- Analysis of Postoperative Remodeling Characteristics after Modular Inner Branched Stent-Graft Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A prebifurcated axillobifemoral polytetrafluoroethylene graft simplifies carotid to carotid to subclavian bypass.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2022Article
- Comprehensive review of hybrid aortic arch repair with focus on zone 0 TEVAR and our institutional experience.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Editorial: Novel insights into aortic arch repair.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its inception in the early 2000s, hybrid arch repair (HAR) has evolved from a novel approach to a well-established treatment modality for aortic arch pathology in appropriately selected patients. HAR procedures have been proposed as a means to circumvent the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with open total arch replacement. These procedures, all of which remain off-label applications of approved endograft technology, combine more conventional open surgical techniques, to create endograft landing zones, with thoracic endovascular aortic repair to exclude the aortic pathology from the circulation. The current classification system for HAR was proposed in 2013 and consists of three types, designated by the Roman numerals I, II and III. The current system has become outdated, however, with the advent of newer technologies, and herein we propose a new, updated classification system that is more encompassing with regards to the broad array of options available to treat aortic arch disease. Likewise, an institutional algorithm to guide patient and operative selection for HAR is presented. Patients are considered for HAR if they have either high-risk comorbidities or high-risk anatomy, with an important feature of the algorithm being that any decisions about repair strategy should be made by a surgical team with expertise in both open and endovascular techniques. Despite being performed for nearly two decades, the evidence around HAR consists mainly of single center series (level B-C evidence) with no randomized controlled trials. The data suggest HAR to be a safe alternative to open repair with acceptable short and mid-term results. As we as aortic surgeons continue to move towards less invasive approaches, both conventional open and hybrid techniques will remain important tools in the toolbox for arch repair, although the advent of multi-branched arch endografts will almost certainly reduce the extent of open or hybrid repair in many patients and eliminate it altogether in others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.