Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926174›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Proceedings2022

COVID-19 prediction through X-ray images using transfer learning-based hybrid deep learning approach.

Mohit Kumar, Dhairyata Shakya, Vinod Kurup, Wanich Suksatan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Proceedings, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohit KumarDepartment of CSE, University Institute of Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Dhairyata ShakyaCAI Info India, Bangalore, India.
Vinod KurupBell, Toronto, Ontario.
Wanich SuksatanHRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bell (Canada) · CAChandigarh University · INChulabhorn Hospital · THInfosys (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few months, the campaign against COVID-19 has developed into one of the world's most sought anti-toxin treatment scheme. It is fundamental to distinguish cases of COVID-19 precisely and quickly to help avoid this pandemic from taking a wrong turn with a proper medical reasoning and solution. While Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) has been useful in detection of corona virus, chest X-Ray techniques has proven to be more successful and beneficial at detection of the effects of virus. With the increase in COVID patients and the X-Rays done, it is currently possible to classify the X-Ray reports with transfer learning. This paper presents a novel approach, i.e., Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (HDCNN), which integrates Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) architecture for the finding of COVID-19 using the chest X-Ray. The transfer learning approach, namely slope weighted activation class planning (Grad-CAMs), is used with HDCNN to display images responsible for taking decisions. In this study, HDCNN is compared with other CNNs such as Inception-v3, ShuffleNet, SqueezeNet, VGG-19 and DenseNet. As a result, HDCNN has achieved an accuracy of 98.20%, precision of 97.31%, recall of 97.1% and F1 score of 0.97. Compared to other current deep learning models, the HDCNN has achieved better results, and this can be used for diagnosis purpose after proper approvals.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworkCovidGANDarkCovidNetGrad-CAMsRecurrent Neural Network

Identifiers

PMID34926174
PMCPMC8666290
OpenAlexW4200361736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.