Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926134›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical engineering2021

A decade in review: use of data analytics within the biopharmaceutical sector.

Matthew Banner, Haneen Alosert, Christopher Spencer, Matthew Cheeks, Suzanne S Farid, Michael Thomas, Stephen Goldrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew BannerDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Haneen AlosertDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Christopher SpencerCell Culture Fermentation Sciences, Biopharmaceutical Development, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew CheeksCell Culture Fermentation Sciences, Biopharmaceutical Development, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Suzanne S FaridDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Michael ThomasDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Stephen GoldrickDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are large amounts of data generated within the biopharmaceutical sector. Traditionally, data analysis methods labelled as multivariate data analysis have been the standard statistical technique applied to interrogate these complex data sets. However, more recently there has been a surge in the utilisation of a broader set of machine learning algorithms to further exploit these data. In this article, the adoption of data analysis techniques within the biopharmaceutical sector is evaluated through a review of journal articles and patents published within the last ten years. The papers objectives are to identify the most dominant algorithms applied across different applications areas within the biopharmaceutical sector and to explore whether there is a trend between the size of the data set and the algorithm adopted.

Identifiers

PMID34926134
PMCPMC8665905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.