Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926129›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health2021

Rasch analysis of the Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool (BAST) in chronic traumatic brain injury.

Shannon Juengst, Emily Grattan, Brittany Wright, Lauren Terhorst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity of the Behavioural Assessment Screening Tool (BAST) in chronic traumatic brain injury.Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment · 2025
    Article
  3. The Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool for Mobile Health (BASTArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shannon JuengstDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-545X
Emily GrattanDepartment of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.ORCID 0000-0002-2714-4130
Brittany WrightDepartment of Applied Clinical Research, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2300-0260
Lauren TerhorstDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-2326-8005

Funding

The Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool (BAST): Psychometric Validation and Mobile Health Tool DevelopmentR03HD094445 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JUENGST, SHANNON B · 2018 to 2019
$338k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD094445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool (BAST) measures neurobehavioral symptoms in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Exploratory Factor Analyses established five subscales: Negative Affect, Fatigue, Executive Function, Impulsivity, and Substance Abuse. In the current study, we assessed all the subscales except Substance Abuse using Rasch analysis following the Rasch Reporting Guidelines in Rehabilitation Research (RULER) framework. RULER identifies unidimensionality and fit statistics, item hierarchies, targeting, and symptom severity strata as areas of interest for Rasch analysis. The BAST displayed good unidimensionality with only one item from the Impulsivity scale exhibiting potential item misfit (MnSQ 1.40). However, removing this item resulted in a lower average domain measure (1.42 to -1.49) and higher standard error (0.34 to 0.43) so the item was retained. Items for each of the four subscales also ranged in difficulty (i.e. endorsement of symptom frequency) with more severe symptoms being endorsed in the Fatigue subscale and more mild symptoms being endorsed in the Impulsivity subscale. Though Negative Affect and Executive Function displayed appropriate targeting, the Fatigue and Impulsivity Subscales had larger average domain values (1.35 and -1.42) meaning that more items may need to be added to these subscales to capture differences across a wider range of symptom severity. The BAST displayed excellent reliability via item and person separation indices and distinct strata for each of the four subscales. Future work should use Rasch analysis in a larger, more representative sample, include more items for the Fatigue and Impulsivity subscale, and include the Substance Abuse subscale.

Indexed as

behavioremotionsmeasurementpsychometricstraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34926129
PMCPMC8673913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.