ArticleZeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health2021
Sex and age differences in attitudes and intention to adopt personalised nutrition in a UK sample.
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Experiment in Personalized Shopping for Optimal Health, with Integration of Nutrigenetics and Gut Microbiome Information.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward colorectal cancer lifestyle risk factors among adults in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Factors influencing the intention of young adults to adopt genotype-based personalised advice on diet and physical activity according to perceived weight status.Journal of nutritional science · 2024Article
- Precision Nutrition to Improve Risk Factors of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.Current nutrition reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThere has been an increase in the development of technologies that can deliver personalised dietary advice. Devising healthy, sustainable dietary plans will mean taking into consideration extrinsic factors such as individual social circumstances. The aim of this study was to identify societal groups more or less receptive to and likely to engage with personalised nutrition initiatives. SAMPLE AND
methodsVolunteers were recruited via a social research agency from within the UK. The resultant sample (
resultsMANOVA (Tukey HSD applied) indicated that females and younger people (aged 18-29 years) had more favourable attitudes and were more likely to intend to adopt personalised nutrition. There were no differences in attitude toward or intention to adopt personalised nutrition between different education levels, income brackets or occupational groups.
conclusionThese results imply that females and younger people may be most likely to adopt personalised nutrition in the future. Initiatives to promote healthy eating should target males and older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.