ReviewCureus2021
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in the Imaging of Gliomas: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- AI-driven estimation of O6 methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients: a systematic review with bias analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- A Language Performance Model for Predicting Glioma Recurrence and Molecular Biomarkers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Deep learning model for screening causes of activated partial thromboplastin time prolongation using clot waveform analysis at multiple wavelengths.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hybrid classical and quantum computing for enhanced glioma tumor classification using TCGA data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transforming Medical Imaging: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Integration in PACS for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy and Workflow EfficiencyCurrent medical imaging · 2025Review
- Enhancing cancer stage prediction through hybrid deep neural networks: a comparative study.Frontiers in big data · 2024Article
- Article
- Deep learning based on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images improves the predictive power of survival models in primary spinal cord astrocytomas.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Recognizing schizophrenia using facial expressions based on convolutional neural network.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Recapitulating the Key Advances in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of High-Grade Gliomas: Second Half of 2021 Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Combining Multi-Shell Diffusion with Conventional MRI Improves Molecular Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas with Deep Learning.Cancers · 2023Article
- Predicting Survival in Patients with Brain Tumors: Current State-of-the-Art of AI Methods Applied to MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Texture Analysis of Enhanced MRI and Pathological Slides Predicts EGFR Mutation Status in Breast Cancer.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Uses of artificial intelligence in glioma: A systematic review.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In neuro-oncology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a critically important, non-invasive radiologic assessment technique for brain tumor diagnosis, especially glioma. Deep learning improves MRI image characterization and interpretation through the utilization of raw imaging data and provides unprecedented enhancement of images and representation for detection and classification through deep neural networks. This systematic review and quality appraisal method aim to summarize deep learning approaches used in neuro-oncology imaging to aid healthcare professionals. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a total of 20 low-risk studies on the established use of deep learning models to identify glioma genetic mutations and grading were selected, based on a Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 score of ≥9. The included studies provided the deep learning models used alongside their outcome measures, the number of patients, and the molecular markers for brain glioma classification. In 19 studies, the researchers determined that the deep learning model improved the clinical outcome and treatment protocol in patients with a brain tumor. In five studies, the authors determined the sensitivity of the deep learning model used, and in four studies, the authors determined the specificity of the models. Convolutional neural network models were used in 16 studies. In eight studies, the researchers examined glioma grading by using different deep learning models compared with other models. In this review, we found that deep learning models significantly improve the diagnostic and classification accuracy of brain tumors, particularly gliomas without the need for invasive methods. Most studies have presented validated results and can be used in clinical practice to improve patient care and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.