Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926043›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Diagnostic Evaluation and Cervical Spine Surgery in the Setting of a Cardiac Left Ventricular Assist Device: Challenges and a Case Illustration.

Austin H Carroll, Ehsan Dowlati, Charles Miller, Daniel R Felbaum

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Austin H CarrollDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
Ehsan DowlatiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
Charles MillerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, USA.
Daniel R FelbaumDepartment of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to incompatibility with magnetic resonance imaging, patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) presenting with pathologies of the spinal soft tissues or neural elements represent diagnostically complex cases. We present a case of a patient undergoing a CT (computed tomography) myelogram and subsequent successful cervical posterior laminectomy. A C1-C2 lateral puncture approach CT myelogram revealed nearly a complete block of contrast movement at the level of the C2-C3 vertebrae concerning a compressive etiology. The cervical lateral approach was chosen based on patient symptomology and concern that contrast dye injected in the lumbar spine would not travel to the region of interest due to altered CSF pulsatility caused by the LVAD device. A C3-C7 posterior laminectomy was then successfully performed. Intra-operatively, however, there was no sign of a compressive lesion, and ultrasound confirmed a decompressed spinal cord. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of pre-operative evaluation in patients with LVADs in which the efficacy of performing CT myelograms is also questionable due to potential alterations in cerebrospinal fluid movement due to variations in arterial pulsatility due to LVAD physiology.

Indexed as

cervical spinediagnosisleft ventricular assist devicemyelogramneurosurgeryorthopaedic surgeryspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID34926043
PMCPMC8671078
OpenAlexW3212903837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.