Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34926017›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Neurologic Complications in Heart Transplant Recipients Readmitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Helin Şahintürk, Beyza Meltem Yurtsever, Özgür Ersoy, Seda Kibaroğlu, Pınar Zeyneloğlu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helin ŞahintürkAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TUR.
Beyza Meltem YurtseverAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TUR.
Özgür ErsoyCardiovascular Surgery, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıd Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, TUR.
Seda KibaroğluNeurology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TUR.
Pınar ZeyneloğluAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TUR.
Başkent University · TRİstanbul Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Neurologic complications after transplantation surgery are major causes of morbidity, and the incidence of neurologic complications among heart transplant recipients varies from 7% to 81%. In our study, we aimed to determine the incidence, etiologies, and risk factors of neurologic complications among patients readmitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after heart transplantation. Method In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of all patients who underwent cardiac transplantation from February 2003 to July 2019 were reviewed, and those admitted to the ICU due to neurologic complications during the early and late postoperative period were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups based on the development of neurologic complications to compare demographic and other characteristics. Results A total of 130 heart transplant recipients were analyzed. We excluded 33 patients from the study because they either had neurologic complications or died postoperatively without discharge from the intensive care unit. The mean age of the cohort was 35.4 ± 18.5 years, and 74 (76.3%) were male. Out of those 97 heart transplant recipients, 22 (22.7%) developed neurologic complications. Five patients (22.7% ) were admitted to the ICU in the first month, six patients (27.3%) were admitted to the ICU between one and six months, and 11 patients (50%) were admitted to the ICU six months after transplantation due to neurologic complications. The most common diagnosis was posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) (n = 6, 27.3%). The other diagnoses were calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (n = 5, 22.7%), intracranial hemorrhage (n = 3, 13.6%), seizures (n = 2, 9.2%), stroke (n = 2, 9.2%), femoral neuropathy (n = 1, 4.5%), myopathy (n = 1, 4.5%), phrenic nerve damage (n = 1, 4.5%), and cerebral abscess (n = 1, 4.5%). The rate of neurologic complications was higher in males when compared with females (p = 0.03). Both groups were similar in terms of the etiologies of cardiac failure, coexisting disease, and anticoagulant and immunosuppressive usage. The requirement for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and the incidence of acute kidney injury were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of sepsis was significantly higher in patients with neurologic complications (n = 8, 36.4%, versus n = 5, 6.7%; p < 0.001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly higher in patients with neurologic complications (21.4 ± 15.8 versus 11.1 ± 13.3 days, p = 0.01). The risk of developing neurologic complications is 3.036 times higher in males, and this is statistically significant (odds ratio (OR), 3.036; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.078-8.444; p = 0.036). Conclusion Our results suggest that neurologic complications develop in 22.7% of heart transplant recipients admitted to the ICU, and half of them are seen after six months postoperatively. PRES was the most frequent (27.3%) neurologic complication. The risk of neurologic complications is three times higher for males. The mean length of hospital stay and incidence of sepsis were significantly higher in heart transplant recipients who developed neurologic complications.

Indexed as

heart transplantationicuintensive care unitneurologic complicationstransplantation

Identifiers

PMID34926017
PMCPMC8654072
OpenAlexW3212643285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.